[...]
We are ALWAYS using the display when using a notebook, and the nicer MBA displays are giving the user a better visual experience when the user is watching any video, viewing photos, graphics, and etc.
However, if I was just using an ultraportable for writing Word/Pages documents, the Lenovo would be the way to go.
[...]
If you are just writing you can use a pentium4 from 2004 as well (If the laptop would have had a great keyboard as well).
Really, with an i5/7 and up to 8GB RAM, how can you say that it's "only" good for writing? If you work in IT/ComputerScience in general, you do other work than graphics and/or audio (Sure you may do graphical simulation as well, but that does not happen on the road so much), at least you don't need 100% color correctness and whatnot. I for one work with Eclipse, Netbeans, Terminal, Acrobat, LaTeX (editor) and XY. None of these programs needs a "beautiful" screen. No offense, but that statement makes no sense to me.
I don't want to argue about the display quality. I've only seen a dozen X-Series around campus and at my friends, and none of them seems to have obvious display problems like dark spots or uneven backlit, but maybe it is just me...
I'm happy to chime in on the Lenovo x201/x301 displays, I've had enough of them and there's many around our office so I'm not basing my comments on 1 or 2 machines.
The Lenovo screen sucks, it's bad, very bad. Just as described above by another poster, horrible viewing angles, dark spot's, plus I'll add dull, grainy with an awful 'sheen' to it under artificial light in the evening.
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5546&review=lenovo+thinkpad+x201+x201s+tablet
I just read that review and it really seems like the only true contra for the X-series is indeed the display. They say the colors are not as vivid and/or seem to be washed out, but nothing about non-uniform lighting or stains of color near the edges as indicated by angusticeps.
As I already said, I don't want to argue, obviously the displays are not as good as the apple panels (or even junk I've you want to call it that), but I worked on a X300 today for some time, as I'm thinking about purchasing one when my macbook dies, and the screen was totally sufficient for daily stuff (reading pdfs, watching random (HD) youtube videos).
I don't work with graphics, nor do I watch more than one movie on my macbook per month (I have a TV) and I also don't look at pictures on my laptop for hours.
What I want in a laptop is the performance I need to get the job done, a nice keyboard, a "decent"
matte screen and long battery life all while being ultraportable (light and relatively thin, and max 13,3"). Sure, I'd love a perfect display as well, but for watching some random show while on the train, or a youtube video, I don't think I would mind the display.
Of course, if your computer must be a multimedia talent as well, the screen is obviously very important, but to say you can't use them because of the screen seems to be a bit over the top.
Oh and btw. have you ever been sitting across from someone and wanted to show him something on you laptop, without getting up or turning around your laptop so that you cannot look at it at the same time? No? Well, then you obviously don't care that you can move the Thinkpad's display angle so low, that it's almost in line with the keyboard..
It's just that a Thinkpad seems to be far more useful and useable in a real-world-work-environment (to me).