Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

macuser154

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 17, 2009
372
0
UK
I'm pretty sure I'm gonna get a 17" MBP soon, the only thing I'm curious about is how gaming performance fares with all those extra pixels.

I've seen a few benchmarks, but they are almost exclusively run at 1024x768. I don't mind sacrificing texture quality etc. in order to run a game at native res.

So if any of you don't mind sharing some frame rates etc. with Windows games at 1920x1200 I would really appreciate it.

Cheers
 
I'm pretty sure I'm gonna get a 17" MBP soon, the only thing I'm curious about is how gaming performance fares with all those extra pixels.

I've seen a few benchmarks, but they are almost exclusively run at 1024x768. I don't mind sacrificing texture quality etc. in order to run a game at native res.

So if any of you don't mind sharing some frame rates etc. with Windows games at 1920x1200 I would really appreciate it.

Cheers

I played Modern Warfare 2 with 1680 x 1050 resolution and it was fairly fluent with medium to high settings. I don't know about the frame rate though, but it was more than 25fps.
 
I have a MBP 17" (specs in sig) and I play some Steam games (Left 4 Dead, TF2, Left 4 Dead 2) and I find that they play very well with medium to high settings. Very smooth. In TF2 I can even play with AA on and it's still smooth! I also play Fallout 3 with no AA and medium to high settings and it is wonderful!

Hope this helps,
King Mook Mook
 
I'd argue that Left 4 Dead and Team Fortress 2 are not very performance-intensive games (of course, that doesn't make them any less fun). I'd recommend running the Far Cry 2 graphics test instead, you can test it in different qualities and see what FPS you get at any time.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.