If i could be bothered to find it, I repeatedly said how i DID NOT want to have the hassle of a replacement.. but wanted to have a fix. It seems that there's a few people who DONT have this issue, and I am hoping that my new replacement will not have this issue either.
Fair nuff.
I am wondering if the people who aren't seeing the problem are because they're not taxing their computers enough. That's kinda why I have been pushing for some kind of standard, repeatable steps so we can determine this.
If everyone on this forum who is watching these posts takes their computer and runs it through a simple 1 hour test session and reports back, then if some are reproducing the issue and some aren't then it's a pretty good indication you're safe in getting a replacement.
If the problem is however that some people are doing no more than surfing Disney.com or using the 9400 chip, then we don't have an accurate idea of how many are effected. They might ALL be effected, or only a small number...my original and overall point is until we stop complaining about nonsense and start doing some real tests we're essentially ignorant consumers.
If you think Mapple is going to be quick on this then you obviously haven't been around this company long enough...I'm still waiting to hear about stuff from years ago that I had questions about. Lets be proactive consumers and become educated on the subject so that as many people as possible are on the same page.
If it turns out it's a design flaw and we ALL pitch in to determine that, then we might all be getting new computers a lot sooner than if we keep falling for the, "Oh, we've never heard of this issue" crap you're getting from Mapple.