MBP -- difference in 128MB and 256MB VRAM?

Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by NewSc2, May 30, 2006.

  1. NewSc2 macrumors 65816

    Jun 4, 2005
    New York, NY
    Thread title pretty much sums it up.

    I had first thought of purchasing the 17" MBP, but after the Macbooks came out I don't really feel like spending twice the money for not much more laptop.

    Anyways, after looking it over I think I will purchase the lowest end MBP. This is for audio use, but I do play games on occassion (perhaps with OSX 10.5's possible Windows virtualization I'll play more), so I was considering the next bump up for the graphics memory.

    I don't think I want to spend the extra $400, but I was wondering if anybody has any benchmarks comparing the two video processors? Possibly for dual-booted Windows games like HL2?
  2. kevin.rivers macrumors 6502a


    Dec 4, 2005
    The graphics chipsets are the same in both 15" MBP. The added features of the $2499 Model will all add to performance, i.e. 256MB VRAM, 2.16Ghz processor, 1GB RAM.

    However, you could take that $500 extra and bump the Hard drive in the $1999 model to the 7200RPM version and buy 2GB of memory from an online retailer for about $200. This would probably outweigh the added features of the $2499 model.

    As far the difference between 128 and 256, it won't be much depending on what games you are playing. If you are a casual gamer, 128MB will be enough for you. And if you were to take my suggestions above, your system would runs leaps around the base $2499 model. Good luck to you! :)
  3. remowilliams macrumors member

    May 17, 2006
    I'll also add that it seems that the 17" MBP graphics card is clocked significantly higher than the 15" MBP.
  4. Nate4747 macrumors regular

    May 7, 2006
    How did you come by this information? Is there an OS X application that tells the card specs or did you get the data from Windows?

  5. dmw007 macrumors G4


    May 26, 2005
    Working for MI-6
    I doubt that the difference in VRAM size would make a real noticeable difference. Both should be fine for gaming. :)
  6. remowilliams macrumors member

    May 17, 2006
    I used that ATI tool under XP/Bootcamp. My MBP17 shows 425/450 (core/mem) by default. That seems to be ~30% higher than the speeds I've seen others post for the MBP15.
  7. joseph2166 macrumors 6502

    Jan 11, 2006
    Just for the record my 256mb graphics card on my 20" iMac is clocked to 398/396 according to the ATI thing

Share This Page