So I checked apple store and I think the choice will be between:
13" Air
1.8GHz i7
256GB SSD
4GB RAM
or
13" MBP
2.8GHz i7
128GB SSD
8GB RAM
The difference in price is minimal. I also plan on getting an iPod. How's the latest classic sound quality-wise?
I had a 15" MacBook Pro since 2007, but just replaced it with a brand new 13" Air. I also contemplated getting the 13" MacBook Pro instead of the Air, however I must say that I agree with Steve Jobs - the Air is the future of laptops. Yes, the Pro offers more expandability, you get the SuperDrive, you are able to expand RAM, Disk space, et.c. However, do I need the extra expandability? No. The MacBook Air is perfect for me, and comparing the base MBA to the base MBP, the MBA offers the best performance thanks to the SSD. Moreover, it's so sleek looking and easy to carry anywhere. The MBP of today looks not much different than my old MBP from 2007. The Air on the other hand - looks so modern and amazing.
For me, the MBA offers the best compromise between performance and portability. But then again, I have an iMac for my heavier tasks. Whether the Air is sufficient for you, I cannot answer. Do you normally upgrade your computers RAM/HDD? I don't. Instead I save the money, sell the computer and purchase a new one when it no longer suits my standards. Hence, the MBA is perfect for me. If you do upgrade your RAM/HDD, you should scratch the MBA. Then the MBP is definitely the best, and only choice for you.
If I wouldn't have had my iMac, I would probably have gotten a new 15" MBP, or the rumored 15" Air.
If you are an audiophile however, do note that the Air does not offer digital sound output through the headphone jack, unlike the MBP. If you often use a DAC for digital sound, the MBP would be a better choice.
So I checked apple store and I think the choice will be between:
13" Air
1.8GHz i7
256GB SSD
4GB RAM
or
13" MBP
2.8GHz i7
128GB SSD
8GB RAM
The difference in price is minimal. I also plan on getting an iPod. How's the latest classic sound quality-wise?
256GB SSD = $200.
Bam, now don't you wish you got a Pro with a superior screen, up to 16gb RAM etc?
If you don't need much processing power and all you're doing is light stuff, then MBA
...and (with the 16gb ram) up to 1gb of video memory for the on-board GPU (vs 384mb).
256GB SSD = $200.
Bam, now don't you wish you got a Pro with a superior screen, up to 16gb RAM etc?
And superior CPU, better battery life, better feeling keyboard (keys have slightly more travel) and (with the 16gb ram) up to 1gb of video memory for the on-board GPU (vs 384mb).
Wow - you two just showed your absence of intelligence. First things first, if you would have had the IQ enough to read my post, you would of seen that I don't personally upgrade RAM/HDD. For me - it's a waste of money, money which is rather saved for a new computer, so why would I (notice, I) worry about being able to upgrade to 16GB of RAM?
Wow - you two just showed your absence of intelligence. First things first, if you would have had the IQ enough to read my post, you would of seen that I don't personally upgrade RAM/HDD. For me - it's a waste of money, money which is rather saved for a new computer, so why would I (notice, I) worry about being able to upgrade to 16GB of RAM? Yes I'm aware of the performance increase. Do I necessarily need it? No. Do I rather save the cash and buy the newer models? Yes. Did I mention I have an iMac for my heavier tasks? Yes. Moreover, why are you comparing apples and oranges? Why do you compare a base Air to a modified, SSD, 16GB MBP? As I said, the base MBA offers even better performance than the MBP in their base 13" forms. It is also better looking, lighter, sleeker, snappier (thanks to the SSD) and I am able to carry it anywhere.
Secondly, how is the screen superior? Yes the colors may be better. Does that make it better - no. The MBP has a resolution of 1200x800, the same resolutions which the original MB had back in 2006. Wow - talk about superior. The low resolution may work for you, but personally coming from a 15" MBP, I cannot stand it. Thus, I value the higher resolution as being more important than the number of colors it can display or whatever.
Better keyboard? Certainly not.
I am certainly in the wrong ballpark here with an MBA, but coming from an MBP I do have a say, and I am able to offer a more holistic argument than some of you are. Do not think that I did not do my homework before purchasing a $1000 computer. As far as my needs are concerned, I do believe I would know better than you.
That said, I would maybe not recommend the MBA to the OP, as a primary computer.
The iPods have really gone downhill in terms of sound quality since their initial release. If you're listening to MP3's, it won't make a difference, but if you're listening in FLAC or any other lossless format you might want a LOD to portable DAC/Amp combo such as the Fiio E7. 🙂
How are they better? I haven't heard about this before.
A main computer? How about a Mac Pro with a 30" Cinema Display?
Main to me = not portable, but MAIN.
Portable = secondary/luggable/part time use.
In other words, if I want to get real work done, I use a desktop. I have always felt a bit like trying to do 'serious' work on a laptop is like using a Tinker-toy or an underpowered slug.