The one thing I like about having a 240GB SSD is that I have Windows 7 installed and it can be booted in Parallels in about 5 seconds.
I have a 120GB OWC SSD in my MBP (without the Optibay). For me it is fine. I have 95GB available, that said, I do keep most of my files on my iMac.
However, a 1TB FW800 (portable) drive would solve your storage concerns. I know for certain that I'd get by with just 120GB if I had a decent portable HDD.
If I want to run bootcamp, how big is the average partition that is required/needed for it to be a useful install?
Agree with some others that 128 can be more than enough if you know what you're doing.
Right now, if I exclude my VMs that I require for work, I'm using about 50GB of my 128 Samsung 470. That leaves me with nearly 70GB left over - more than enough for music files or whatever that require frequent access. And that's the key. Do I need it literally every day? The fact is, if one sat down and really analyzed what on a drive they access frequent enough to warrant carrying it around on an internal drive, they'd find an 80/20 deal going on - 80% of what's on the drive is infrequently accessed and probably better served on an external 7200 SATA connected with a SATA/USB adapter if/when needed. 20% of what's on the drive might need frequent access, and it is this percentage that matters when calculating what size you really need inside the thing.
Some people just are packrats who feel compelled to carry everything around and can't fathom the notion of external drives. They're perfectly fine removing the optical drive from the MacBook Pro and forcing people to use an external, but try to get them to untether the high capacity drive and they're up in arms even though the same effective logic applies - external drive can manage your stuff, you can plug it up and use it when you need it. Yet they won't hear of it. These are the same cats who criticize the optical drive fans. Talk about double standard.
Now I'm not suggesting that one sacrifices space they truly need. TO me a 256GB SSD is the pie in the sky max a person should logically ever need. 64GB is too small given the size of the OS and applications. 128 is smallish, but can work depending on workflow.
I set mine at 20GB for bootcamp. Really depends on what you intend to install. Games and such run better on Windows. If its just classwork, 20GB is plenty. Also...with no pictures, music, or videos on my laptop, I use up about 130GB (installed games are SCII and TF2). I could probably knock it down to 100GB or less, but it would involve effort. I don't really want to worry about an issue like this imo. I'd rather my computer "just work" then to shave seconds off opening apps, booting up, etc.
it might be a good idea to store all your music collection on icloud and download the necessary music. it'll save you alot of space especially if you have over 10gb of music.
And i think if you store all your music and photos on your external hardrive, it won't be a problem
Alright, lets do some math here folks:
I have:
11GB Music
3GB Photos
16+4GB= 20GB Lion
6GB Apeture
8GB FCPX (other media contents on external)
30GB Bootcamp with W7 Ult.
That adds up to 78GB. Add MS Office Pro and that should only be a few more! I think I can manage.
To your previous question, the 128GB works fine for me. It actually forces me to re-assess just what I really need stored on the laptop vs. external drives.
And yes, I think you're perfectly fine with a 128GB SSD.
Can I run Windows 7 (Bootcamp) off the external drive?
Will playback be slow/laggy when I try to play HD Movies/TV files off my external drive?
Yes, but it's tricky to install Bootcamp that way. The built-in installer wants to do it on the primary drive and requires jumping through a bunch of hoops. If you think you'll need the 30-40GB for Bootcamp in addition to the 70GB, then you might want to go up one step on the SSD to 160 or 256. Mind, your cost is going to double depending on the model. That's making the assumption that VMs are not an acceptable alternative for whatever reason - since you can run a VM off of anything you want.
5400: Yes, depending on how high res the stuff is. 7200 or greater: no.
I have a 128gb SSD and I just use an external to store all of my music, movies, and time machine backups.
Isn't bootcamp and a VM the same thing but apple just calls their VM "Bootcamp"?
Negative. A VM is a virtual environment. It's a bunch of files that are being run such a way as to act like it's a real operating system. You're running Mac OS AND whatever other OS in the same session. The trade off is lower performance, because you're sharing resources.
Bootcamp is running native Windows. When Windows is running, Mac OS is not, and vice versa. The tradeoff is that you can't access Mac programs when running in Bootcamp.
One is concurrent, one is not, if you want to dumb it down.
Get it with the 128 gb SSD - then buy the aftermarket optibay and buy a 500 gb Momentus HDD hybrid and install that in the optibay.
Bring the external SuperDrive the few times a year you would need to read/burn a dvd/cd.
Problem solved
----
Vh/Regards
Claus - TapaTalk on my Ip4
i got a 2.2 15 with a 128ssd and a 750gb data doubler in the optibay it fits my needs perfectly.
That is perfectly understandable, so I assume I don't need a partition to run a VM for Windows 7? That could save space....
Don't need a partition to run a VM, but VMs can be fairly large. Most VMs are between 20 and 50GB depending on how you configure it. If you create a small 20GB Windows VM you should be fine, you can always map your external into the VM and store files to and from Windows to the external drive, to keep space in check.
I understand I could do store the VM on the external, but would performance be slow because I'm reading/writing files off a external USB 2.0 drive?
128G is small. If I were you, I would go for HDD for now and change to SSD when the price is more acceptable.