Media server

G5s do not make very good servers due to power consumption. you may want to consider a small 2 bay nas server.

 

its not out of the question if you add a sata pci card. a g4 mdd can have about 4tbs of storage that can be accessed over a home network

 

I don't know about that you'll have to wait for someone a bit more knowledgable on this subject to come along but I have heared of people using powerpc media servers in the past to communicate with snow leopard and maybe lion but i don't know about 10.8

The latest itunes requires 10.6.8

 

I'm not sure what else you use your server for, but for straight up media / file sharing you don't need any of the enterprise features of Leopard Server.

You can run iTunes 10 on Leopard. iTunes uses the DAAP protocol which is pretty standardized - it will work without hitch between your two machines. Same goes for all of the other services.

 

your os if you are using powerpc based macs and not the current intel ones is limited to os x 10.5.8 no workarounds

it just will never never never never ever ever ever work 10.6 and above are built for intel based chips no emulation nothing.



glad we could get this part outta the way early

 

No, he wasn't clear. I believe it would work. I would recommend a G4 as well. However, I don't know exactly what you are doing, and if it requires on-the-fly encoding, any PowerPC would not be suitable.

I use a 1.83GHz Core Duo Mini as my server. It works well, and can be upgraded to a Core 2 Quad if necessary.

 

Then a g4 with dual processors 2 gigs of ram a decent graphics card and a sata card and such should work just fine for your needs

 

I don't think all of those should be needed. Processing power is not an issue, it is just moving files over a network. No graphics card is needed at all. SATA is not needed- read/write speeds do not need to be high at all.

 

Sata is not needed but if this guy wants more than 1tb or storage then hes gonna want to get an actual new drive for his server. At this point I would only use ide drives in computers that absolutely don't support anything else.

 

iTunes 10 has home sharing which will work perfectly with ATV.

 

I use one of these NAS drives http://www.techradar.com/reviews/pc...ed-storage-nas/d-link-dns-320l-1095589/review

It has a built in iTunes server, torrent client and supports AFP, works great for me, I plugged in two large drives and have them configured on RAID 1 mirroring. Good power save setup as well.

 

That setup should be able to do the actual decoding as well... my single G4 does that.(720p limit. 1080p not fluid enough) Outputs straight to HDMI to the screen.

The fileserver shouldn't use more than 1-5% of a single G4 capacity.

 

I run a G4 MDD as a multipurpose server. It runs 10.5.7 server (10.5.8 was creating trouble in my LAN, so I rolled it back a bit, but YMMV)

I have no experience with ATV, nor with ML, but I know Lion works fine, so I'd assume no problems with ML...

The machine is a Dual 1 Ghz, has a sonnet SATA card and works fine otherwise, but:
- the power requirements are far beyond optimal (min. 100 W)
- the thing is noisy (even though I've done a reasonable job taming the wind tunnel) (Idle noise level currently three times of my Mac Pro, but only a third of the original - all subjective measurements by my ears)
- It produces too much heat, which is a problem as I've stored it in a big cupboard (3 m3)

If these are no problem with you an MDD would fit the bill, but I'd seriously consider one of the last batch, an MDD2003 (http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/powermac_g4/specs/powermac_g4_1.25_mdd.html) if you can find one. They run way cooler and many of the problems burdening the original batch have been remedied...

Personally, I'm looking hard at supplanting that rig with a mini using a large external storage. I know FW800 is not the speediest of buses, but even with the current setup, I typically only get 60-80 MBps transfer speeds, and the mini+FW800 will hardly be much worse...

RGDS,

 

Good plan. Keep in mind, that the MDD's CPU cooler is not what you could call high tech, so ambient temperature should definitely stay below 40c, preferably below 30c for the cooler to have any significant affect.

RGDS,

 

The cpu won't reach above 27% I would imagine just doing server work so I think that the ambient temp won't make that big of a difference

 

Based on my limited (but hands on) experience, I'd still tend to disagree...

True, server work is hardly is CPU intensive. My server's average utilization (as reported by uptime) is around 30-35% (file serving, web serving, torrents).

At those stress levels, the CPU diode reports temperatures, which closely follow the following equation:
CPUA = Ambient + Ambient*1,25

When ambient is 15c, CPUA reports 35c
When ambient is 20c, CPUA reports 45c
When ambient is 30c, CPUA reports 66c (like right now)

And these figures are with nap enabled through CHUDtools. Without Nap, you can add 10-20 degrees to those readings...

Like I said, crappy heat sink...

RGDS,