Sigil macrumors newbie Original poster Sep 3, 2014 #1 Is the difference in performance significant between the Mercury EXTREME 6G and the Mercury Electra 3G? Thanks Mac Pro (Mid 2012) 3.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 16 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB OS X 10.9.4 (13E28) Last edited: Sep 3, 2014
Is the difference in performance significant between the Mercury EXTREME 6G and the Mercury Electra 3G? Thanks Mac Pro (Mid 2012) 3.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 16 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB OS X 10.9.4 (13E28)
alphaod macrumors Core Sep 3, 2014 #2 The Extreme has better performance with compressible data. Be honest, at this point there are many better option on the market now. The Samsung 840 EVO/PRO comes with mind.
The Extreme has better performance with compressible data. Be honest, at this point there are many better option on the market now. The Samsung 840 EVO/PRO comes with mind.
Weaselboy Moderator Staff member Sep 4, 2014 #3 Sigil said: Is the difference in performance significant between the Mercury EXTREME 6G and the Mercury Electra 3G? Click to expand... Not for you there won't be much of any difference because the speeds will be limited by the SATA II interface in your Mac. I'm with alphaod. No need to use OWC's overpriced drives. Just grab a Samsung EVO or Crucial MX100 wherever you can get the best price.
Sigil said: Is the difference in performance significant between the Mercury EXTREME 6G and the Mercury Electra 3G? Click to expand... Not for you there won't be much of any difference because the speeds will be limited by the SATA II interface in your Mac. I'm with alphaod. No need to use OWC's overpriced drives. Just grab a Samsung EVO or Crucial MX100 wherever you can get the best price.
C CASLondon macrumors 6502a Sep 4, 2014 #4 you can also be more clever about where you mount that thing to avoid the SATA II bottleneck. PCIE slot adapter, or adapter to optical drive slots, there are even other ideas out there I believe
you can also be more clever about where you mount that thing to avoid the SATA II bottleneck. PCIE slot adapter, or adapter to optical drive slots, there are even other ideas out there I believe
Sigil macrumors newbie Original poster Sep 26, 2014 #5 Thanks Thanks everybody! I appreciate the advice.