Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,713
39,655


Facebook parent company Meta today unveiled "the most advanced pair of AR glasses ever made," called Orion. Meta claims Orion looks and feels like a regular pair of glasses, but with augmented reality capabilities.

meta-ar-glasses-interface.jpg

The glasses have been in development for over five years, and Meta describes them as lightweight and great for indoor and outdoor use. Unlike a VR headset, AR glasses augment the real world rather than shutting it out, providing digital experiences that are not constrained by the display of a smartphone or headset.
Orion has the largest field of view in the smallest AR glasses form to date. That field of view unlocks truly immersive use cases for Orion, from multitasking windows and big-screen entertainment to life-size holograms of people - all digital content that can seamlessly blend with your view of the physical world.
According to Meta, Orion is a "feat of miniaturization," featuring components that are sized down to a fraction of a millimeter. The glasses have clear lenses that allow the wearer to see other people's eyes and expressions.

Orion includes built-in contextual AI that is able to "sense and understand" the world around the wearer to "anticipate and proactively address" the wearer's needs. Meta AI can do things like craft a recipe from what's inside your refrigerator, or phone a friend while the user washes dishes.

meta-ar-glasses-design.jpg

Orion is not a consumer focused product, but it is also not just a research prototype. Meta is providing its employees and "select external audiences" with access to Orion, so that it can use the data to "learn, iterate, and build" toward a consumer AR glasses product line.

Going forward, Meta wants to improve the AR display to make visuals sharper, optimize for a slimmer form factor, and work to build at scale to make the AR glasses more affordable.

Apple too is rumored to be working on AR glasses, but the product is still many years away from launching at this point. Apple has struggled with getting the power of an iPhone into a device that uses only a fraction of the power to prevent overheating.

Along with AR glasses, Facebook today introduced new AI features for its Ray-Ban Meta Glasses and unveiled a super cheap $300 Meta Quest 3S mixed reality headset, a more affordable version of the Meta Quest 3.

Article Link: Meta Unveils 'Orion' Augmented Reality Glasses
 
Last edited:
Pretty interesting, cool to see, even if not for me. I just can’t look back, after Quest etc, on any of these products that don’t work natively with Apple’s ecosystem. It’s like night and day, using AVP with all my Apple subs, content, etc. I am afraid, just like their Ray Bans (damn, they must be salty about these), it halts my interest, full stop. And that’s not even touching the FACEBOOK of it all.


Lots of info on it here: https://www.meta.com/en-gb/blog/quest/orion-ar-glasses-augmented-reality/
 
This looks like a really impressive prototype, and immediately seems like it has more potential than Vision Pro or Quest products. This just gets me excited to see what Apple can do in this space, though it will likely be a while before we see what they are working on.
"While Orion won’t make its way into the hands of consumers"

A *key* detail in any conversation that ultimately tries to compare these with AVP, Quest, Ray Ban Meta glasses, etc...
 
Apple AR device should have come first. So many more applications. Lying down watching video without a hand holding a phone. Big plus. “You can’t see what your not looking for…” would be the tag line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrWojtek
This is a step closer to what I assume Apple’s far-future trajectory for Vision is. AR/spatial computing, to be at all mainstream, needs to be a pair of glasses that you barely notice are different from regular glasses. These clearly are not that, but they’re much closer than Vision Pro is.

On the other hand, I’m not going to declare Apple behind in the march to the goal, since this is not a product you can actually buy, so it’s still effectively a prototype, not burdened by all the things necessary to do in a consumer product. Apple could well have internal devices like this, but they’re not going to mention them unless and until they are ready to sell, which could be 5-10 years down the line.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.