This movie isn't suffering from an actor that doesn't look like Jobs, its suffering from covering a subject that is still very fresh and relevant in our everyday lives. That said there really isn't a human being that can pull this roll off as Steve's photos are still splashed on news and media to this day. Some say Kutcher looked more like him but did they help the movie at all, did it help convince anyone that was Jobs on the screen. Not even close.
Sorry. Emotionally, there is zero connection for me. It feels like he isn't even trying to be Jobs. All I can say is Fassbender better damned well have the nuances and inflections and body language down to a science.
This movie has the wrong director. This is not opinion. It's fact.
A great director, directs. They understand detail and nuances. The ensure props, postures and mannerisms are spot on. An actor interprets and is the subject of direction.
In this case from the poster alone it is clear that the director has failed. If the director has failed here then there is a good chance they will fail completely.
Any director worth their salt would have had the hair sorted, the pose sorted. We know Michael Fassbender is a top notch actor. The director... meh.
This movie has the wrong director. This is not opinion. It's fact.
A great director, directs. They understand detail and nuances. The ensure props, postures and mannerisms are spot on. An actor interprets and is the subject of direction.
In this case from the poster alone it is clear that the director has failed. If the director has failed here then there is a good chance they will fail completely.
Any director worth their salt would have had the hair sorted, the pose sorted. We know Michael Fassbender is a top notch actor. The director... meh.
There were times when I thought he shone. Especially when he was pissed off, it got uncanny at times. I would blame the director and producers more than Ashton. That movie was a 6/10 with the possibility of being an 8.5/10, even a 9/10.
The story was rushed and there were so many important parts that were left out. It should have been titled "Jobs at Apple 1974-1996".
Did anyone notice that weird walk? I haven't seen a lot of video of Steve walking, but never noticed it in his presentations.
This movie may have the wrong director in your opinion, but, given that Danny Boyle has won BAFTA Awards, Academy Awards and Golden Globe Awards, "meh" is a wholly inaccurate descriptor.
Danny Boyle is one of the most diverse and versatile directors in Hollywood. Given the unique premise of this film, he should be able to knock it out of the ballpark.
You don't know what you're talking about.
A movie can still be excellent without the actor looking like the real person.
Just like in Schindler's list
Image
Why does he have to look like Jobs? It is a movie, it doesn't matter what he looks like.
Exactly. Will you ever hear anyone say, 'you know Citizen Kane is a great film and all, but Orson Welles looks nothing like William Randolph Hearst'!
It did just dawn on me that Anthony Hopkins didn't look a thing like nixon, but still pulled off a perfect act...so yeah, let's wait and see...
Image