Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Micron's chief business officer has hinted, without calling it out by name, that Apple's tough supplier negotiations contributed to the conditions behind the global memory shortage.

apple-silicon-1-feature.jpg

In remarks given to The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, Sumit Sadana explained that Micron was unable to fund capacity expansion during the industry's previous slump, a period when its margins turned negative partly because some buyers pushed relentlessly for lower prices.

We told a couple of the customers who were being very aggressive with pricing at that time that this is not constructive. A lot of the industry investments got shut down in 2023 because of really poor pricing and really poor margins.

Micron is one of Apple's memory suppliers, providing some of the DRAM and NAND flash chips that go into iPhones, Macs, and iPads. Apple has a reputation for getting favorable terms from suppliers like Micron through long-term purchasing contracts.

Sadana's comments came just hours after Apple unveiled a sweeping round of price hikes that touched nearly every part of its hardware lineup. Products across the Mac, iPad, Apple TV, HomePod, and Vision Pro lines all went up in price, with only the iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods left untouched. Apple's stock closed down 6% the same day, its worst single-day performance in more than a year, wiping out roughly $265 billion in market value.

Apple CEO Tim Cook forewarned about this outcome more than a week earlier in comments to the same publication, warning that price increases had become unavoidable given how the company was being squeezed on memory and storage costs. Cook said Apple had been trying to shield customers from the worst of it but had reached a breaking point, describing the shortage as a "hundred-year flood" unlike anything he had seen in more than four decades. He pointed to the surge in demand for high-bandwidth memory used in AI servers, arguing that consumer products were now competing for a shrinking pool of supply and that pricing needed to come back down to earth before Apple's own prices could follow.

Article Link: Micron Suggests Apple Helped Cause Memory Price Crisis
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Z-4195
What a nothing-burger statement from Micron.

In any industry, led by one or two massive consumers or distributors, tough negotiations on commodities/critical components will always be the norm.

That's what bargaining and positioning is all about. Apple is large enough to make demands... and... so is Micron.

One could even argue that Micron had a little more yank at that negotiating table. Nobody wants to take ownership from the fallout due to negative consumer perception as well as the rest of the ripples.
 
It's not really a suggestion but rather reality.

2023 was when the pandemic supply finally turned on. The problem was demand dropped and everyone was had inventory. Remember, 1TB SSDs were regularly under $50. Of course guys like Apple would take advantage of that.

DRAM and NAND go through a regular boom and bust cycle.
 
Apple has long strong armed suppliers, remember the whole GT Advanced Technologies debacle.

I can't say that I'm surprised by these allegations
The whole GT Advanced Technologies story was not anywhere close to being about Apple strong-arming suppliers. Do some more research. GTAT badly underestimated the technical challenges of becoming a large-scale sapphire manufacturer and overpromised what it could deliver.

They ran into major manufacturing problems where they could not reliably produce enough high-quality sapphire. Yield rates were poor. Costs were much higher than expected. The new furnaces didn't scale as planned. They missed almost every major milestone outlined in their agreement with Apple. Even the SEC alleged that GTAT and its former CEO misled investors about the company's prospects.
 
Apple: Hey, Micron! If you'll just accept a slightly lower price on your product and give us first dibs, we'll keep you in business for the next several decades!
Micron: Huh. Slightly lower margins, but solid long-term stability? Sounds reasonable. Sign me up!

AI Firms: Hey, Micron! I'll pay you double what Apple's paying, if you'll give us first dibs instead!
Micron: HECK YEAH! LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOO!

Apple: Well, it looks like we may have to raise prices, due to the AI Firms.
(Note that Apple did not blame Micron... but the entire industry knows the game, so all eyes turn towards Micron.)

Micron: What? What are y'all looking at me, for!? Apple Errr, ummm.... certain companies played hardball! If they hadn't demanded such low prices, this wouldn't be an issue in the first place!
 
Oh Sure Micron, not like you want to make as much money as possible off this Stupid A.I Garbage ? of course not. Bite me
So are you saying they should have turned down the companies looking to pay 2x (and more) for their products?

That sounds like someone who's selling a car, and turns down an all cash price from one person to sell it to a rich person who's been nickling and diming then for years.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.