Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple didn't put out a tablet with a desktop OS. So they didn't try. They put out a tablet with a mobile OS, told everyone that tablets are for content consumption only and everyone just took them on their word.

A mobile OS? How do you mean? iOS is a BSD based OS, that pretty much shares a lot in common with Mac OS X. The only really big difference is in the user interface. It's designed for mobile computing on devices with smaller screens. You seem to be mistaking a mobile-centric OS for an embedded OS used in some mobile devices.

Furthermore, they never told anyone that tablets were content consumption only. In fact they released a page layout program, a presentation program, and a spreadsheet program at the same time the original iPad was introduced.



I find all the people on this board to be a bit disingenuous for having conveniently forgotten Windows Tablets have been on the market for the passed decade, running full blown Windows. If all you same people are so damned excited by the Surface Pro why in the hell didn't you ever buy one of the original Windows tablets or even one of the current tablets that already run full blown Windows; off the top off my head, Archos. If people were actually excited about having a tablet form factor running a full blown desktop OS, all those tablets wouldn't have failed so miserably.

The fact is, and history has shown, THAT VERY FEW PEOPLE NEED OR WANT A "TABLET" DEVICE RUNNING THE SAME CRAPPY OS AS THEIR DESKTOP COMPUTER.

It is little more than a gimmick. In the end you're still using a desktop OS, so why not have a device that IT WAS DESIGNED TO RUN ON?
 
I still think Microsoft is going at it in the wrong way. This thing is too thick, heavy and has a poor battery life if you use it as a tablet. I doubt it'd work as well as regular laptop either. I'd rather get a macbook air or one of those windows ultrabooks than this laptop/tablet hybrid
 
I think that's the key to this device. It's what a lot of people said they were waiting for. The price point seems a bit high and the battery life seems a bit low. But the big determiner of its success will be its adoption by businesses.

Gotta remember, its got almost the same specs as a Macbook Air, the type cover is almost as good as a real keyboard, and it turns into a tablet.

Microsoft MAY have a winner.
 
I have been on the fence waiting for the details of the Surface Pro vs. the latest iPad. I am very familiar in the difference between the two products, but I expected a more similar price point. I was fortunate enough to work with the Surface RT for a whole day a couple weeks ago giving me time to disregard all the reviews and concentrate on what I personally felt about the product. I have also been using Windows 8 on my work laptop for the last couple months. After using Windows 8 as a primary machine, picking up a Surface just comes natural. Microsoft definitely spent a lot of time and resources on developing Windows 8 and the more I work with it the more I like it.

Now as for vs. the latest iPad. I am still going to have to go for the iPad. One of my favorite options the iPad offers that few other tablets do is built in cellular data. I know, I know... but you can use you phone as a hot spot. Well that is just a bit inconvenient for the way I would use the device. There are definitely features I am going to miss that you get with the Surface, but for my use the iPad is going to be enough.


Man, do I miss my cellular data from my iPad to my surface... I now have to use my phone as a hotspot which is not bad. I actually stopped my 3g service on my iPad to use my phone before getting my surface.

Yeah, using both windows 8 with a mouse and keyboard and then using a touch device really displays the genius in they way they work.

Good luck!

----------

Or who want real work done ;)

So true!!!!!:D
 
When Microsoft tells you it's 4-hour, it will be 2-hour in real life usage. :rolleyes:

Likely true. Gaming time? 1 hour. If you're lucky. Games eat up massive juice, and you never get advertised battery life when doing it, and if the company is fudging "average" battery life, gaming battery life is going to be... dreadful, to say the least. I really don't see how anyone can be stupid enough to try to sell their customers such a product. This thing will pretty much have to move from wall to wall because the battery wont be enough to support it away from one... I thought the days of four hour (or two LOL) battery life was gone. Microsoft has proved me wrong!
 
Man, do I miss my cellular data from my iPad to my surface... I now have to use my phone as a hotspot which is not bad. I actually stopped my 3g service on my iPad to use my phone before getting my surface.

Yeah, using both windows 8 with a mouse and keyboard and then using a touch device really displays the genius in they way they work.

Good luck!

----------



So true!!!!!:D

I can tell you if the iPad wasn't LTE, I would most likely still be deciding. Also with Verizon allowing you to add tablets on for $10 a month the cost is minimal so there is little reason not to use the onboard cellular service.
 
$1,000 for a keyboardless laptop? 100 dollar keyboard addons? I think I'll pass.

Add to that 4 hour battery life? What are they using in that thing...Old tech for sure...Why didn't they put a half decent Lithium Polymer cell in the thing? My Ipad 4 with Retina screen gets < 9 hours on a charge.

Microsoft hardware, apart from the Xbox has never really been that dramatic or good. It's when the software sales continue to decline that the real warning signals will light up Redmond.
 
Dropped the ball on software? Not in the slightest. While Apples iOS does have its limitations so does putting a desktop on a tablet.

It's not even iOS that's really the problem. It's the fact Apple and Google use a commoditized App Store as a distribution model for mobile and as the only way to get stuff on your tablet (short of jailbreaking of course). It's a bad business model - it encourages a race to the bottom and discourages more complicated and more useful software from being developed for tablets because that software is not profitable at lower price points. Basically mobile has become a budget market because the only way to get stuff on your phone is through a single store that has hundreds of thousands of developers undercutting each other to compete for your attention. The Pro avoids all this.

If thats the case, they had it solved 10 years ago when they already had MS Windows on a tablet.

But the problem with that is it did not have mass market appeal. They were expensive, were not touch optimized for the desktop ( We will see how touch optimized it is when Surface Windows 8 Pro version comes out ) along with other limitations.

But it will have its strengths too. But its kind of rehashing what they already had before, but on more current hardware.

10 years ago a tablet was a laptop with a stylus input resistive touchscreen LCD that rotated and collapsed. It wasn't a slate form factor device with a multitouch capacitive screen. OS was XP with some small UI modifications added on, not an OS built from the ground up with touch in mind. And there was no 80 million + unit tablet market back then either. Totally different devices, totally different environment. I owned a Fujitsu P1510 tablet back then and if the Surface Pro was anything like that I wouldn't be buying it
 
Gotta remember, its got almost the same specs as a Macbook Air, the type cover is almost as good as a real keyboard, and it turns into a tablet.

Microsoft MAY have a winner.

Ding ding ding. Same specs as MBA, but thinner and lighter, and has touch. And runs Windows 8, which, like it or not - means it runs a lot of the applications that a lot of people (myself included) want to run. Intel's next rev will improve battery life, or if you're dying for more battery life asap get one of the many atom-based options coming from the other OEMs.
 
Install a torrent client on your iPad, I dare you. Or any other Mac program.

You can't do it, I'll tell you why because everyone is confused :That's a big iPod touch !

This is a full OS WITH ...( W I T H ) touch

MS big mistake is to make the operating system one OS, 16gb taken up just on the OS, battery also admited to be half of RT so this equals 4.5 hrs come on this wasn't thought out thoroughly. I want MS to succeed but bad mistakes has been made same which we could say for apple maps.
 
Because the logic is flawed. Does anyone else who says that Apple tells you the iPad is for content consumption remember the iWork demo that took up a huge chunk of time during the iPad reveal? Granted, iWork for iOS needs a lot of work (Pages is approaching usable) but it still shows that Apple doesn't intend the iPad to be consumption only.

I don't think his logic is flawed at all. The type of work that he is suggesting can't realistically be done on the iPad. That's not a knock at all. Each has their purpose.
 
A mobile OS? How do you mean? iOS is a BSD based OS, that pretty much shares a lot in common with Mac OS X. The only really big difference is in the user interface. It's designed for mobile computing on devices with smaller screens. You seem to be mistaking a mobile-centric OS for an embedded OS used in some mobile devices.

Fine, mobile centric OS. Happy now bro?

Furthermore, they never told anyone that tablets were content consumption only. In fact they released a page layout program, a presentation program, and a spreadsheet program at the same time the original iPad was introduced.

I bought all 3 of those. They all sucked and were basically pretty looking featureless clones of their desktop counterparts. Pages, AKA Ten Dollar Wordpad, was the worse. Here's your gold standard for content creation software on iOS devices right now, which is no wonder people would rather consume it than create it

I find all the people on this board to be a bit disingenuous for having conveniently forgotten Windows Tablets have been on the market for the passed decade, running full blown Windows. If all you same people are so damned excited by the Surface Pro why in the hell didn't you ever buy one of the original Windows tablets or even one of the current tablets that already run full blown Windows; off the top off my head, Archos. If people were actually excited about having a tablet form factor running a full blown desktop OS, all those tablets wouldn't have failed so miserably.

The fact is, and history has shown, THAT VERY FEW PEOPLE NEED OR WANT A "TABLET" DEVICE RUNNING THE SAME CRAPPY OS AS THEIR DESKTOP COMPUTER.

It is little more than a gimmick. In the end you're still using a desktop OS, so why not have a device that IT WAS DESIGNED TO RUN ON?

I did buy one. I owned a P1510 tablet back in the day and the Surface Pro is not the same thing. Not to mention the whole identity of what makes a tablet a tablet was redefined by the iPad blowing up the market. I'm guessing all you guys parroting about how it's already been done have never even seen a pre iPad Windows Tablet.
 
100% this.

For work, I'm a windows guy, so apple is not part of the decision making process in that space. Well, we'll consider it, but its not really a major part of what we do yet.

The Surface Pro is a bad tablet and a bad laptop. It fails at both.

The selling point, being able to run office apps on it (unfortunately, at a massive cost to battery life) is a problem better solved with a cheaper, lower power, longer battery life tablet (be it android, ipad, ipad mini, whatever - hell, even surface RT), and a cluster back at HQ running VDI services.

The whole solution will likely work out cheaper per head above a certain head count, and the end user can get the exact same desktop on whatever end device they use. All their data is securely stored on the company server back at base.

Attempting to push the heavy lifting cpu work to the tablet clearly has too big an impact on battery life - and end device cost.

This is the first generation. When Haswell comes to market, battery life will be better, just as battery technology slowly moves forward. This is the beginning of the changing laptop/tablet era.
 
the rt version of the surface officially has an eight hour battery life with some testers finding slightly longer running times, implying that the surface pro will feature a battery life of roughly four-and-a-half hours, less than most laptops.

extreme_face.gif
 
A mobile OS? How do you mean? iOS is a BSD based OS, that pretty much shares a lot in common with Mac OS X.

But guess what buddy, just like Windows 7 and 8 Phone, and Android, its still a limited crappy mobile OS, you can't even multi task on iOS.

Furthermore, they never told anyone that tablets were content consumption only. In fact they released a page layout program, a presentation program, and a spreadsheet program at the same time the original iPad was introduced.

Sure, they never told anyone it was for consumption.

However, as of right now it lacks Microsoft, Office which is the standard.

Pages....lol

find all the people on this board to be a bit disingenuous for having conveniently forgotten Windows Tablets have been on the market for the passed decade, running full blown Windows. If all you same people are so damned excited by the Surface Pro why in the hell didn't you ever buy one of the original Windows tablets

Becaust most people were still getting their 2nd or 1st computer at that time, and many people literally couldn't afford a tablet, they ran up to 4000 dollars for a high end model, and 2000 for a low end model.

or even one of the current tablets that already run full blown Windows; off the top off my head, Archos. If people were actually excited about having a tablet form factor running a full blown desktop OS, all those tablets wouldn't have failed so miserably.

Compared to Apples numbers maybe.

But if they are still produced, and produced for years, and sold. They made a profit, and did not fail.

The fact is, and history has shown, THAT VERY FEW PEOPLE NEED OR WANT A "TABLET" DEVICE RUNNING THE SAME CRAPPY OS AS THEIR DESKTOP COMPUTER.

So if you Mean Windows 8, the OS that blows away iOS?

It is little more than a gimmick. In the end you're still using a desktop OS, so why not have a device that IT WAS DESIGNED TO RUN ON?

In the case of the surface pro, some people will want real hardware, running real programs, doing REAL work, on a REAL OPERATING SYSTEM.

I love my macs for sure, but the iPad to me, is nothing than for people to watch youtube and play Angry birds on.

Microsoft is not targeting consumers with the Surface pro, its targeting power users, business. And people who do real work.
 
I'm writing this from my surface, I decided to try it as a complete laptop replacement for a week. It will be going back to the store this weekend. There's a lot of things I liked about it but it's just too impractical to use.

The UI was nice and fresh, but the lack of vital apps like facebook, dropbox, youtube etc. really kill it. And IE10 lacks a lot of functionality on some main sites I use that use Flash. It also can't run regular apps so that's a negative of course. It is almost impossible to use on your lap or without a hard surface when using the kickstand and/or keyboard. I have the type cover, its not bad but the trackpad sucks, scrolling is difficult and nowhere close as on a MacBook (and its tiny).

It's got Office which is a major plus but not enough. I do feel very high tech using the touchscreen, and the live tiles are pretty cool. I wish Apple would make their app icon show real time data in some way like this. I didn't notice any extraordinary battery life. And it is pretty slow.

Overall its not the worst tablet, but it's just too little too late.

Now to decide if I should get a 13" MBA or Thinkpad X1 Carbon. :D
 
This is the first generation. When Haswell comes to market, battery life will be better, just as battery technology slowly moves forward. This is the beginning of the changing laptop/tablet era.
Ivy Bridge almost feels like a stopgap. It is better off as a testbed for the 22nm process than power improvements over Sandy Bridge. Haswell is where the real improvements show up with 10W ULV and SoC-like single chip builds show up. It is just months away too.
 
The only important thing here is that battery life. It's kinda hard to sell something that is geared towards portability, releasing people from their desks etc if it's less usable on the go than the laptops most roamers already have...

My prediction - this first generation pro goes the same way as the RT. Not a total flop, but not overly successful. But if MS can get the second generation of both out in the next 6-10 months, with higher resolution screens, better batteries and other small things, then it could end up being a long term success.

But knowing MS, I'm not holding my breath.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.