Yes. Aloha browser does but it uses a VPN.
All browsers on iOS use Safari's engine. Firefox focus browser has ad blocking because it's actually a content blocker in itself. But functionality is very limited as it can't sync or show you history. The on;ymfull fledged browser on the store which supports ad blockers is Aloha.
Obviously, i know it uses a different engine on iOS, but it shares many of the problems and issues with IE on Windows, probably because it has the same (or mostly the same) dev team. Doesn't change the fact that no one outside of Microsoft wanted Edge on iOS, and almost no one outside of Microsoft will install it on their iPhone.
So those are more of content blockers that also provide a browsing feature in/with them, rather than really being just typical 3rd party browsers that have an ad-blocking feature (or can make use of content blocking abilities that exist in iOS that Safari can use).
Yeah they are content blockers with a web browsing add on . The only way to have inbuilt adblockers as a full featured web browser is using VPN. Although I don't know how how those are getting approved. Apple warned Adguard and Weblock both of which are purely ad blockers not to use VPN to block ads throughout the system. But that doesn't apply to web browsers apparently.
Doesn't seem like that's an option in the Firefox app as far as I can tell. Unless you are referring to Firefox Focus, which is a different app and is basically a content blocker with some browsing abilities built into it, as discussed in a few preceding posts.
How is it useless in Windows? Can you provide details please?
I just found this out recently that OneDrive and OneNote are NOT encrypted on their servers, only in transit. Big loser here for that IMO.
That’s wholly inaccurate. IE was developed from mosaic, a browser that I believe predates Netscape. Back in the day, we were excited to try new browsers because websites were made in markup languages which were interpreted by the browser based on loose guidelines. Now there is enough standardization between the way pages render on different browsers that a unique feature is absolutely required to make trying a new browser worthwhile.
The iPhone X literally came out last month. If you want to complain to anyone about apps not being optimized for the iPhone X, blame Apple.
I don't see how this is Apple's fault. It was no secret that Apple would be releasing a new screen size and developer's had plenty of time prior to the release to get their apps optimized for the X. Microsoft is a multi-billion dollar software company, not some independent developer that makes an app in their spare time. They should be held to a high standard.
It's not really Apple and it's more on the developers, but the timing isn't really all that much when everything is considered. Developers could only start working on it all when the updated version of Xcode was released, which was in the second half of September. Depending on other work that might already be ongoing for apps and schedules that are in place and resources that are allocated to what's already being worked on and what has already been planned and all that, it's probably not likely that everyone would jump on it at the very moment or even for a little while, and once they do, there's still the design that needs to happen for it, the development, the testing, the tweaking, perhaps some sort of limited external testing even (depending on the app), so that can take some more time.
I miss Netscape Navigator. And, yeah, Firefox used to be Firebird (with its Thunderbird counterpart), and even Phoenix prior to that.
