Um, no thanks but we have some lovely parting gifts for you, including the home version of our game.
I really wish they'd offer a simple one subscription to rule them all at a fair price.
For work, if you do pivot tables and VB scripting in Excel will Google or Apple work for you? No way, but you represent only 1% of the user base.
From an internal marketing perspective, I understand the subscription model. It gives more consistent income than does releasing a new Office version and getting random tricklings of customer adoption.
However, as people have pointed out, this subscription model ends up costing customers 2-4x as much as the purchase model, WITHOUT adding any material customer value.
The last MS Office I purchased was a $100 student version 2 1/2 years ago. I may upgrade in another 1 1/2 years. For me, the "customer value" is $25/year, not $69 or $99.
At least this bungle opens the door for Apple, Google, and Open (Libre) to improve compatibility with MS Office. Right now I am forced to use MS due to lack of compatibility reading to and from Numbers. If Apple would just patch a few holes, I could be free from MS forever.
It was with much sadness that I said goodbye to Adobe when they instituted a subscription plan for their software,...
Exactly. Not aure why I would pay for MS office on a Mac when I can use Libre Office for free.
The subscription model is only going to encourage me to keep using software I've already paid for and own outright.
Somehow you think:
20gb OneDrive space
60 Skype minutes per month
1 tablet and 1 traditional PC license
is only worth 25$ a year?
Ok Microsoft. Now give me the chance of purchasing a lifetime license, like in past years...
Because i'd rather pay 99-199 bucks one time, than 69 bucks every mf year.
I'm not MacLC, but for me, yes, that's only worth $25, because I don't use skype anymore, and when I do, it's skype-to-skype, which is free, I don't use OneDrive and don't want to, and I already have Office on my computers. I ONLY need a license for my ipad, and IMO $25 a year is a fair price for that.
Keep in mind that something is only valuable to a consumer if the consumer wants it. If I don't want all that extra stuff, it's not worth anything to me.
As an FYI, I am one of the 1% who do need actual MS Office - I'm currently an Office application developer as my day job.
Agreed. Software as service benefits the company but is bad for the consumer. I don't rent software.
O365 University pricing is $69 for a 4 year subscription. (1 PC/Mac + 1 tablet)I hope they do something for students! I only need licenses for one Mac and one iPad! I have 2011 currently, but having the most up to date version that's also on my iPad would be nice. But at the same time my 2011 license was $12 for a single license through my school... Hard to beat that good deal!!
Depends on how many people pay month to month, or on a yearly basis. When you're subscribing to something, you begin to work under the assumption that you're getting your moneys worth on a month to month basis. If they only continue to provide it as-is and never update it for years on end, or if they never fix any bugs that might arise, people will quit subscribing to it.
Remember, subscribing to something is nearly the total opposite of being locked in. An SAAS setup has to provide something worthwhile to you, and continually provide it to you over an extended period of time to keep you subscribing.
Already to many options...either one time payment or free of charge at all. That's what people actually want.
I'm firmly in the pay once group.
This subscription stuff offers nothing to me and everything to M$.
No thank you.
At least you're allowed to store files there. Apple's iCloud (which sells for 40$ for a whopping 20GB per year) is almost useless for many users.
They do still offer this. Student Edition, what, $130?