Microsoft LifeCam Cinema 720p

Discussion in 'Mac Accessories' started by BryanLyle, Aug 18, 2009.

  1. voltron1124 macrumors newbie

    Aug 18, 2009
    Heres one for Mac

    Try out the new aGent V5. I bought one the other week and it records in FULL HD 1600x1200 (as well as the smaller res of the Lifecam 2180x720) on my Mac. The webcam is from Liquid Digital.
  2. Daphoid macrumors newbie

    Jan 18, 2008
    1600x1200 is a 4:3 aspect ratio and not HD.

    2180x720 is not either :)


    are the standard HD resolutions as they support an aspect ratio of 16:9.

    - D
  3. macgizmoguy macrumors newbie


    Apr 11, 2009
    CA, USA
    LifeCam Cinema

    I've been scouring for info on whether the LifeCam Cinema is driverless - UVC compliant - on OSX for my mac webcam site. Still haven't found a definitive answer - short of buying one and trying it. It's a shame web cam manufacturers aren't adopting the UVC standard across the board, would make life easier for Mac mini, Mac Pro tower, Early iMac and Mac mini owners.

    Its important to note really hi-res webcams: 1. Need a TON of CPU power to pump out frames that fast. And more importantly; 2. The majority of Mac video capture and video chat/messenger programs (including Photobooth) CAN'T capture or transmit video at higher than 640x480 anyways!

    And home DSL and Cable connections can't send true HD video frame-rates either! So a cam like the Cinema HD is overkill for the average user. A sharp 1.3mp webcam will give most folks good frame rates with the majority of chat programs out there.
  4. Bbusyb macrumors member


    Sep 11, 2009
    Notts, UK / Alex, Egypt
    I Believe Leo Laport did try it out on TWIT Live and compare it to the Logitech 9000 on both Windows and Mac.

    You can see the comparison test video at the following link

    From what I remember, it was detected correctly on OSX, but some of the advanced options which are only available through the Software did not work.
  5. nbkGh0stly macrumors newbie

    Dec 26, 2009
    Traverse City, MI
    Lifecam Works

    Just plugged in my Lifecam HD on my OSX86 box I just built running 10.5.7 and it recognizes it with no problem. Tested it in iChat. A little laggy but isn't that because iChat has a framerate limit?
  6. Makosuke macrumors 603

    Aug 15, 2001
    The Cool Part of CA, USA
    I bought one of these to try for my dad, because all the stats looked good on paper, and it was pretty cheap. It physically looks nice and does work, but I ended up returning it.

    The Mac (10.6.2) had no trouble recognizing it, and indeed was quite happy to display/record video at the full 1280x720 resolution. However, neither the autofocus nor any brightness adjustment works--those are apparently controlled by a computer-side driver, not automatically by the camera. Since there's no Mac driver (apart from the basic universal camera support), you don't get these features.

    I wasn't particularly surprised by this, but it made it nearly unusable--in regular indoor artificial lighting at roughly arm's length or so from the screen it looked acceptable, but if the light was any brighter it gets horribly washed out, to the point it's pretty much unusable if the sun is out and the blinds are open. I've seen the same thing happen on cameras on Windows if you don't install the driver (heck, some older ones can't be adjusted at all, and are pretty much useless in bright light).

    I also wasn't particularly impressed by the quality--though it put out a hi-def image, the actual quality was mediocre. Again, not terribly surprising given the price, but I was unimpressed. It also seemed a little laggy at the hi-def resolution, though this may have been the Mac software's fault, not the camera's. It seemed normal at a standard-def resolution.

    I suppose if you only ever intended to use the camera at night and didn't care about autofocus it wouldn't be a bad choice, but you could probably get similar quality and (lack of) features for less money were that the case.

    Me, I returned it and ended up buying a Logitech QuickCam Vision Pro for Mac--unlike the MS camera (and the cheaper Logitech Pro 9000) it does the brightness adjustment and autofocus automatically in hardware, so it fully supports these features on the Mac and without any additional software. It's not widescreen (or hi-def), and I don't think it's as attractive as the MS camera, but it works very well, and I'd say the image quality is somewhat higher, too, so I'm happy with it. Cost somewhere around $80 after rebate, which isn't all that much more than the MS cam or Logitech 9000.

    Gotta say I like the manual that came with the Logitech camera--it essentially says "Plug it in and you're done."
  7. Moldarin macrumors newbie

    Dec 9, 2009

    Can the focus and brightness be adjusted using something like iGlasses?:apple:
  8. Charlton macrumors newbie

    Aug 22, 2010
    iGlasses makes no difference. I was hoping macam would come out with something but nothing yet. The camera is completely unusable on a Mac in my humble opinion.
  9. Moldarin macrumors newbie

    Dec 9, 2009
    I bought the camera. What a big mistake to get a non-4:3-ratio camera! All of Apple’s applications such as iChat and Photo Booth are hardcoded for 4:3 so everything look stretched. The only application that handled the widescreen ratio was QuickTime X

    Got it cheap, though …
  10. HiDEF macrumors 68000


    Jun 23, 2010
    Miami, FL
    I currently have a Mac Mini and I'm also in the market for a webcam, what would you guys recommend? Maybe Logitech Quickcam 9000 Pro?
  11. b_scott macrumors 6502a


    Mar 31, 2008
    did you try using it for Skype?
  12. Joe323 macrumors newbie

    Sep 8, 2006
    So I shouldn't bother spending extra money and getting an HD webcam since I plan on using it only for iChat and Skype?
  13. drtanz macrumors member

    Sep 27, 2012

Share This Page