It's a style that already existed before. Apple just chose to use it. They did not invent it, are you saying that no one else is now allowed to use this modern style now?
Yes they copied the coloured t-shirts and ID's. That's blatant. But damn near every store that sells electronics here in London that's expensive, has a damn near identical look. Like Samsung stores, Sony stores, gadget stores, Toshiba stores. LG stores.
Location is everything...
I can't relate to your experience in London, but here in southern California, up until now, I have never seen any of the companies you've mentioned use the "same" style of the Apple store like Microsoft is doing.
Now to be fair, gkarris, pointed me to an article showing Sony revamping their SonyStyle stores to take on more of Apple's style which I do applaud because it makes business sense for Sony to do so with their large number of products.
Nobody is arguing that businesses adopt/incorporate the latest trends/style in their marketing and advertising. This is common practice. In advertising and marketing design, that's considered brand and product placement. Tiffany's spends lots of money on their marketing, store design, and graphic design so that no one would even consider that they were the same kind of store as a bargain diamond dealer.
But as you admitted, Microsoft is blatant in their copying Apple's style down to the colored t-shirts and lanyards. Even, the Sony Store revamp retains their own brand identity in their application of Apple's retail style.
http://www.sonyinsider.com/2011/03/31/first-sony-store-opens-in-los-angeles/
To incorporate a competitor's design style to the extent that you could simply replace the competitor's logo and products with your own, is simply diluting your company's own brand identity and marketing placement. It's like "throwing in the towel" in marketing.
What I see with Microsoft's approach to the retail store concept is that they're just applying the superficial visual style of Apple's retail store style instead of figuring out how to maximize the underlying business strategy behind the retail store concept.
Apple created the retail store because at the time their products were not being presented adequately or in volume and Apple was in danger of shutting it's doors if they didn't figure out how to change that situation.
Microsoft is not in the same situation or facing the same problems. Opening Microsoft Retail stores doesn't make any business sense. Add to that, copying the "style" of your long-time competitor, it comes across as a poor (yet costly) attempt by a corporation to remain relevant in the public eye. By having little to no distinction in style, Microsoft's marketing strategy is not building up their brand identity and not making it more distinguished from their competition. Therefore, what is their marketing goal or strategy here?
With the broad availability of Microsoft productions at retailers worldwide and online, why does Microsoft need to open a retail store in the first place? The biggest complaints against Apple when they first opened their retail store was from their existing resellers. Apple as the manufacturer was directly competing against the retailers who were trying to make a living seller their products. Apple had to do it because they knew they had to rethink how their products were sold to general public or face extinction.
Once again, Microsoft is not facing the same situation that Apple faced then so the question arises...again. Isn't Microsoft, the manufacturer of Office et al, now competing with all it's resellers? Eating into their market share? Taking a bite out of there annual sales?
So, what is Microsoft's goal with opening 75 more retail stores with the same look of an Apple store? How does that make my life better? That's the real question this article raises.
Sorry all the electronics stores by you look the same to you. That IS boring.