they are comparing like devices. 64mb versions. and yeah pretty funny
Comparing hardware specs - yes, but an iPad isn't just the hardware is it. MS simply made a new netbook with touchscreen capabilities, but is woefully behind in actually making their software programs touch capable. That's where they and anyone who says, "but I can run any Windows program on it" are just fooling themselves. Sure, it will run any program, but functionally, you're forced to add keyboard and mouse, making the tablet nothing more than just a small form factor laptop screen that requires an extra keyboard and mouse.
It's not advancing technology, but rather going backwards. MS, because they want, or have to, keep legacy users happy, is stuck in a horrible position of having to make products that a just so full of compromises, the MS employees must pull their hair out developing this stuff.
----------
I don't know why you would complain about increased capability. It's not like you cant run only Windows 8 native apps if you want.
How is it increased capability? It's a dang laptop screen that requires a keyboard and mouse to use any of the legacy Windows programs. In other words, a new form factor netbook. They're selling it as being two things, laptop alternative and tablet, but it's not great at either, because they're trying to make it both without putting any effort into optimizing it for either.
Tablets are what they are. Made to be touched and operated with your fingers. For those companies making apps designed specifically for tablet use, it's a natural way of inputing and working with the tablet. When you take a program made for desktop or laptop use and think you can easily just have it work on a tablet, you find out pretty quickly, it doesn't work that way - hence MS pushing and marketing the use of a keyboard and mouse with the Surface.