Microsoft's Charney Suggests 'Net Tax to Clean Computers

Discussion in 'Apple, Inc and Tech Industry' started by *LTD*, Mar 3, 2010.

  1. *LTD* macrumors G4

    *LTD*

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    #1
    http://www.pcworld.com/businesscent...rney_suggests_net_tax_to_clean_computers.html

    Microsoft's Charney Suggests 'Net Tax to Clean Computers

    By Robert McMillan, IDG News Service

    How will we ever get a leg up on hackers who are infecting computers worldwide? Microsoft's security chief laid out several suggestions Tuesday, including a possible Internet usage tax to pay for the inspection and quarantine of machines:

    Today most hacked PCs run Microsoft's Windows operating system, and the company has invested millions in trying to fight the problem.

    Microsoft recently used the U.S. court system to shut down the Waledac botnet, introducing a new tactic in the battle against hackers. Speaking at the RSA security conference in San Francisco, Microsoft Corporate Vice President for Trustworthy Computing Scott Charney said that the technology industry needs to think about more "social solutions."

    That means fighting the bad guys at several levels, he said. "Just like we do defense in depth in IT, we have to do defense in depth in [hacking] response."

    "I actually think the health care model ... might be an interesting way to think about the problem," Charney said. With medical diseases, there are education programs, but there are also social programs to inspect people and quarantine the sick.

    This model could work to fight computer viruses too, he said. When a computer user allows malware to run on his computer, "you're not just accepting it for yourself, you're contaminating everyone around you," he said.

    The idea that Internet service providers might somehow step up in the fight against malware is not new. The problem, however, is cost.

    Customer calls already eat into service provider profits. Adding quarantine and malware-fixing costs to that would be prohibitive, said Danny McPherson, chief research officer with Arbor Networks, via instant message. "They have no incentive to do anything today."

    So who would foot the bill? "Maybe markets will make it work," Charney said. But an Internet usage tax might be the way to go. "You could say it's a public safety issue and do it with general taxation," he said.

    According to Microsoft, there are 3.8 million infected botnet computers worldwide, 1 million of which are in the U.S. They are used to steal sensitive information and send spam, and were a launching point for 190,000 distributed denial-of-service attacks in 2008.



    Microsoft's Internet Tax. What an awesome idea. I've always wanted to pay for Microsoft's mistakes and the mistakes of people who actually chose their products. Especially as someone who doesn't use Windows (when he can help it.) I've never had a brother. But now I've got MS as Big Brother. **sniff, sniff.**
     
  2. ravenvii macrumors 604

    ravenvii

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Location:
    Melenkurion Skyweir
    #2
    Seriously? The tax should be to subsidize people switching to Linux or OS X - the internet will be very much on the way to being virus-less then. :p
     
  3. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #3
    He's been saying this for years. MS just wants another way to strike it big again.
     
  4. *LTD* thread starter macrumors G4

    *LTD*

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    #4
    I thought that was what Yahoo was for.
     
  5. Rodimus Prime macrumors G4

    Rodimus Prime

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    #5
    The problem you run into is lets assume OSX was the majority at 90% market share. It would have a massive bot net problem.
    Most of the viruses that spread bot nets are trojans. There is very little if anything an OS maker can do to guard again human stupidity.
    Trojans work because people install them thinking it is something else. This turns their computer into a zombia and hows it to be used for DNS attacks, a spam mail server and so on.

    Trogans get around all the security people like Apple and MS built into their OS because the user installs them and gives them permission to be installed. Trogans are a direct link to market share. 90% of the market is going to have 99% of the trogans.
     
  6. chrono1081 macrumors 604

    chrono1081

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Location:
    Isla Nublar
    #6
    Wow a net tax to clean computers! What a stupid f*cking idea!

    Its funny how the rich don't seem to care about raising taxes.

    I'm sorry, I use mac and linux for a reason aside from productivity, its because of malware. Its not 100% accurate saying that "Windows has more malware cause most people run windows". Yes, that is a large extent, but windows is also terribly insecure and has the registry which is another source of problems.

    As for trojans, people will always fall stupid to those. I just had a user an hour ago who tried to fix a problem by downloading some crapware minutes before I got to his office and now his machine is rediculously infected. His excuse was "Well the website I downloaded it from said it was legit".

    I refuse to pay taxes for idiots like that.
     
  7. djellison macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Location:
    Pasadena CA
    #7
    Windows 7 is considered by IT security experts to be MORE secure than Snow Leopard.
     
  8. DoFoT9 macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #8
    *dislike*.

    what a rediculous idea - great way to make microsoft go broke tbh
     
  9. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #9
    It figures. A Microsoft tax. They copy everything from Apple. :D
     
  10. MisterMe macrumors G4

    MisterMe

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    USA
    #10
    Um-m-m-m, no.
     
  11. Abstract macrumors Penryn

    Abstract

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    Location Location Location
    #11
    Apple users like to brag about virus-free OS X, but viruses are just one security issue out of a number of malware issues.
     
  12. notjustjay macrumors 603

    notjustjay

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Location:
    Canada, eh?
    #12
    Hey, if Microsoft wants to charge additional "taxes" to cover the cost of their mistakes, I say be my guest -- all they have to do is raise the price of Windows by however much they want.

    Sure, it'll mean they're that much less competitive than the alternatives, but hey, noble sacrifices in the name of protecting the customers, right?

    Or maybe they should just own up to the fact that they screwed up, and fix their own problems without pretending that they belong to everyone else?
     
  13. *LTD* thread starter macrumors G4

    *LTD*

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    #13
    OS X *has no* malware issues, viruses or otherwise.
     
  14. pdjudd macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Location:
    Plymouth, MN
    #14
    Well Trojans are an issue, however the big issue with those is that they require user intervention and deceit to use them. As long as a user is involved, your system has a big gaping security hole and there is no OS on earth that can stop it. Such a system is always going to be a cat and mouse scenario.

    Te only way to make computers secure is to remove all human interaction with them - that just isn't going to happen though. As long as humans are subject to deception, this problem will always be with us.
     
  15. Rodimus Prime macrumors G4

    Rodimus Prime

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    #15
    Go look up how most bot nets are made and you will find out it is done by trogans. Trogans can just as easily infect macs as windows because they use user stupidity to get installed.
    Trogans have more to do with market share than anything else because they by pass everything by using the biggest security hole in any os. That is the user.
     
  16. ChrisA macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Location:
    Redondo Beach, California
    #16
    This is correct but if the OS has an access control list security built into it you can contain the trojan. With such a system the user does not simply say the new application is "OK", he checks boxes that allow (or not) certain activity. Like "This app may access the INternet Y/N". Or "This App may read files on the local hard disk Y/N".

    There are other ways to contain apps. For example a spread sheet program should ONLY be able to read and write to spread sheet files and musci players should be be able to read speadsheet files.

    The trick for Apple would be to make this easy to understand and use.
     
  17. mags631 Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    #17
    Link, please.
     
  18. localoid macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #18
    If you actually believe that you're living in denial, however we can be thankful that Apple has decided to take a more realistic and proactive approach to the OS X malware threat.

    Apple now includes a system within Snow Leopard that detects known malicious software, including the OSX.RSPlug.A Trojan Horse (first discovered in 2007) and the OSX.iService malware (embedded in the pirated iWork installer).

    [​IMG]

    You can learn more on this subject, from the MacWorld article: Inside Snow Leopard's hidden malware protection
     
  19. roadbloc macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
  20. djellison macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Location:
    Pasadena CA
    #20
    http://***********/?q=windows+7+snow+leopard+security

    Every comparison I find gives the nod to Windows 7.

    (what the heck? You can't link to ****** at Mac Rumors? Anyway - the point is this - get off your butt and google it - the results are clear for all to see)
     
  21. *LTD* thread starter macrumors G4

    *LTD*

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    Location:
    Canada
    #21
    I'm sure it is.

    Almost as secure as running an OS for which there is no malware at all in the wild. MS has to defend against nearly everything. Apple has to defend against nothing. And judging by Windows 7's popularity (or rather, ubiquity), this situation will continue indefinitely.
     
  22. djellison macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Location:
    Pasadena CA
    #22
    LTD - i've asked via PM, I'll now ask in public.

    Do not reply to my posts. You are on my ignore list. Little if anything of what you say is either valid or of interest. Please do not reply to my posts again.
     
  23. roadbloc macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #23
    How can you say that when localoid's post just proved you wrong? And when most IT experts think that Windows 7 is more secure than Snow Leopard? You're outnumbered *LTD* - the world vs you. Best put another round of Apple favoured links in your post gun.
     
  24. Peace macrumors Core

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #24
    I have no desire to pay a tax for someone else's computer problem.
     
  25. thejadedmonkey macrumors 604

    thejadedmonkey

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Location:
    Pa
    #25
    while I have no intention of feeding the LTD troll, could someone please post the link again, as I have LTD on my ignore list too and would like to see the article.
     

Share This Page