50% accuracy is no better than guessing.
If you could throw a dice and tell me 50% of the time which number was going to come up I'd be impressed.
50% accuracy is no better than guessing.
...they mentioned 14,000 mAh battery. In an iPad!?!?
FYI, the 17" Macbook Pros have 9,000 mAh batteries, which themselves are 2x thicker than an iPad. Unless there has been a battery technology breakthrough of which we haven't been notified, the report holds zero credibility.
Actually, in a 17" MBP, you have a lot of space and weight for the optical drive, the HDD drive, the keyboard, trackpad, motherboard, large speakers, and finally the removable battery...
The iPad "motherboard" isn't a lot bigger than the one in the iPhone. So you can save a LOT of space and weight by having SSD, non-removable battery, etc... just like the MacBook Air, or even more when you don't have keyboard and trackpad.
So, in the iPad, most of the device space & weight is for the Screen and the battery, as showed here:
Image
So, I wouldn't be surprise we could have a bigger battery than the MBP, in the iPad and the MacBook Air.
Spid
While we're at it, let's throw in a rumor that the new iPad is going to have a $200 price drop.
...they mentioned 14,000 mAh battery. In an iPad!?!?
FYI, the 17" Macbook Pros have 9,000 mAh batteries, which themselves are 2x thicker than an iPad. Unless there has been a battery technology breakthrough of which we haven't been notified, the report holds zero credibility.
"Digitimes has a bit of mixed record on Apple rumors with our internal tracking putting their accuracy at 55%."
What kind of tracking are you doing that gives them over 50%.
By my reckoning they are wrong >90% of the time, when they are not just quoting the obvious. Hey there will be a new iPad and iPhone in 2012. No **** Sherlock?
But when they make up crap, like the 5 times they said we would have 7" iPads, or OLED ipads, or OLED phones, or 4" screens on the next iPhone, etc....
Someone please post that SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY picture
damir00 said:So what's the claimed difference between the mid- and high-range models?
Yees, but the MBP has 90Watts, the iPad 25...
There's a difference
*|\__/|**/_/
*(>'.'<)*\_\
("")_("")*/_/
PIKA PI!
Piggie said:50% accuracy is no better than guessing.
If you could throw a dice and tell me 50% of the time which number was going to come up I'd be impressed.
I thought you couldn't even charge the iPad over USB. Doesn't it say "Not Charging" if you try?
Apple includes a 10W charger with the iPad... that's a big hint!
It doesn't have watts but Wh. MacBook's batteries are 10.8V, while batteries in mobile devices are 3.6V. You can't just compare mAh.
If you could throw a dice and tell me 50% of the time which number was going to come up I'd be impressed.
...they mentioned 14,000 mAh battery. In an iPad!?!?
FYI, the 17" Macbook Pros have 9,000 mAh batteries, which themselves are 2x thicker than an iPad. Unless there has been a battery technology breakthrough of which we haven't been notified, the report holds zero credibility.
They really gain nothing at announcing at a third-party event.
A couple of days ago, the rumor was that the iPad 3 was going to be released in February for Steve Jobs birthday....now its January for iWorld?