Are we talking about connecting two iMacs directly with a crossover cable, or can it be done just as well with two iMacs connected over a LAN? Or do modern Macs autodetect whether an Ethernet is standard or crossover, making it possible to use any old Cat5e+ cable?
Yes to all of the above. I don't know when Macs became able to autodetect but it was a long time ago.
I still have an orange Cat 5e crossover cable. I tried it when I transferred my 2010 to my iMP a few months ago to see if it made any difference. None, of course.
I was recently buying sone Cat 6 cables for one of my clients and saw that you can now buy anything in orange. Huh? It used to be that orange was only used for crossover.
I love that it's 98% guaranteed!
As opposed to a phone call to Apple if you have problems. Try
that with cloneware.
I just migrated by brother-in-law's 2018 Air from a 2015 13 inch Pro. TB 3 to TB 2 with an adapter. It was relatively fast.
Interesting. Everything I have been doing lately is from non-TB Macs getting ready for the school year so I've been using ethernet or network installs depending on the school.
I've just read post after post after post after post after post after post (had enough yet?) ...
Mr. Halloran and I will disagree about how to back up
Just to be clear, I haven't been reading about it. I have done this well over a thousand times over the last few years.
There's no way to really explain how much better this is -- you have to try it yourself.
Both CCC and SD are FREE to download and use for 30 days.
I used to clone but stopped because it's too damned slow when you want to, say, do a classroom of iMacs in one day.
With TM, you can boot the computer, but ONLY to the Apple "utilities" (same as booting from the recovery partition).
This SEVERELY LIMITS what you can do next.
There's nothing wrong with giving the cloneware guys the money if you want some of the features.
Clonware is an API for functionality already contained in Disk Utility. You also fail to mention that it copies—it cannot actually clone.
My disagreement is your constant insistence that it is somehow better. It's not. Or faster—it never is. The Apple tools are
faster and more convenient. I still have an active license to a very good cloning app. I test it now and then. Time=$ and it it ever saved me any, I would use it. But it doesn't.
And... you now have A SECOND BOOT DRIVE from which to boot the Mac.
Are you so confident that you will never have an "I can't boot!" moment?
Yes, 100% absolutely. No exceptions. With APFS, if something gets totally screwed up, I can do a complete restore on the boot drive to any Time Machine backup run the last 24 hours. On my 2010 iMac, takes about 3 minutes; my 2017 does it in a minute. And this is after I have completely hosed my machine to the point where it won't boot. I do service calls to my clients — ok, rarely because things work so well. All the old Macs I service had their HDDs and batteries replaced years ago and students don't have Admin privileges.
I do a lot of beta testing and this does happen to me. Many times, the only recourse is to restore to a previous state. With TM or a clone, this would take many hours. I do keep a network of TM backups but haven't had to restore my own machines that way in years. TM is set and forget.
I have never had a "time machine failure" because ... I've never used TM, not once, and NEVER will.
I wouldn't brag about not understanding the Apple tools. It's why I can do things cloneware can't.
But I'm sure we'd disagree about long-necked banjos, as well !
I use my real name. Not knowing who you are, why would your opinion on that matter to me?
Know anyone who wants to buy a blonde Vega PS5 like the one Pete Seeger played in the late '60s to the '70s?
Since I can no longer play, it needs to find a new home.