Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
quigleybc said:
That's insane....70 G's for a TV......

That thing better rub my shoulders, bring me food and drinks, massage my feet, read my mind and record shows I like, transform into a boat and give me career advice for that kind of money......
hahaha i KNOW!!!
 
70 grand seem high, really high, i mean a 50''' is 3 grand, so a 103'' should be a little more then 6 grand, if even when you add on the "higher you go the more each inch is" 70 grand seem high.... i'll take 23 50'' Plasma TV thanks
 
zap2 said:
70 grand seem high, really high, i mean a 50''' is 3 grand, so a 103'' should be a little more then 6 grand, if even when you add on the "higher you go the more each inch is" 70 grand seem high.... i'll take 23 50'' Plasma TV thanks


True, it is a rather large jump in price for the extra screen size.
 
yes I'd have to agree, that is a pretty shotty photoshop job on the pic. Simulated image is one thing. Using a super grainy photo and inserting a crystal clear image is another.
But as others have said, it's marketing. Some people will see that pic and go "ooh, it's got such amazing picture!
Time for another super fun futurama quote:

Leela: Fry, you're wasting your life sitting in front of that TV. You need to get out and see the world.

Fry: But this is HDTV. It's got better resolution than the real world.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.