Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
with this information it becomes somewhat clearer...why releasing a video ipod or ipod phone when one can release a video ipod phone. As you say - that will blow people's minds. Apple knows that they have to push the envelope in order to enter the market and to stay there...

1 of 2 things is going to happen with thiPhoen:

1. Apple will come up with something so revolutionary it will blow everyone;'s mind
2. It'll be an MVNO that will burn bright for 3 months and fizzle.

I'm hoping for number 1, but hesitant to put money on it.

$649 for a phone... uh oh.
 
WiFi / WiMax iPhone?

Will the iPhone support WiFi or WiMax? The rumored prices are way too high. Mac them a 3rd-1/2 of the rumored price and make them support WiFi and WiMax and Skype or iChat etc, then yea I'd buy. I'm sick of cell phone providers, contracts, monthly fees, etc.
 
Like I've said all along. Phones are heavily subsidised by the carriers. Those k800i phones aren't cheap on their own, for example.

Apple will find it hard to compete with carrier subsidised phones if they are just selling unlocked phones.

You at Uni in Manchester?

This price doesn't shock me in the slightest.

Also, my 3rd Gen iPod 20GB which is still alive cost me £320 or $640 when I bought it. I wouldn't pay that for an ipod now. No chance. I just happened to then. Love it.
 
...and this is why America is so far behind. Contracts here are a year and some are at 18 months tops. A 2 year contract is unheard of in the UK.
Or, UK is so far behind. Years ago one yar contract was the norm, now almost no company offers a single year contract.
 
How about $649 with FREE calls from that point on, to all who have a .Mac account?

Crazy suggestion, i know, but that would be very cool indeed.

MA.

(So Apple pays Cingular or whoever with a flat fee for every phone sold.)
 
Clarification from the research note.

Clarification

Runkle actually claimed: "full screen LCD; 3.5 inch (28x21)" and approximately 4/10ths of an inch thick. Also incorporates a Virtual Click wheel.

This would make it sound more like a full-screen button-less design that people are expected for the video iPod.

arn

Lets not forget there are supposed to be two completely different phones from Apple next year. The first is a basic candybar model resembling an elongated nano due 1Q and the second a much more advanced multifunction device that has a large touchscreen screen and virtual interface due 2Q or 3Q. There can easily be two different configurations of each phone as well. I think specs and pricing has gotten mixed up between the two at this point as only one model is mentioned.
 
Iv'e never paid upfront for a phone in my life so don't see it as any differant. If its offered as part of a contract the price is irrelevant. Maybe Nokia et al are making a fortune out of their phones selling them to the carriers who then sell them onto us. If you look on the Nokia US site they are selling phones for $500 and $600


http://www.nokiausa.com/phones/comparephones/1,8392,fltr=1|ordr=3,00.html

Obviously lots of money being made out of phones as the price is hidden. Maybe this is the REAL reason Apples getting into this field...

Umm...this bears repeating so I'll quote it. These prices are NOT out of line for unlocked phones at full retail price, people!!! Nokia's top two "N-Series" phones cost $599 (for the N80), and $649 (for the N93).

These prices have NOTHING to do with the final price that the customer pays with contract. Everyone shocked by the price knows nothing about the economics of the cell phone industry.

As a few more data point, here are prices from the SonyEricsson site:

http://shopwireless.sonyericsson.com/buy/products/cat/66

Note that the one "smartphone" on the list, the P990, is $749. The much more basic, mass-market W810i is still $474.

On the Treo site, the 700p sells for "$619-$649" retail:

http://web.palm.com/products/communicators/config/zip_entry.jhtml?categoryId=270003

The Samsung Blackjack and Motorola Q both also sell for about $500.


So Apple's prices are completely in line with what other companies are offering. But take heart - with a contract the prices to the consumer should be much lower. For example, the same W810i phone that SE is selling for $474 on its website is fairly readily available for FREE with a 2-year contract if you shop around. From $474 on the SE website to FREE with a 2-year contract. Think about that. That means that it's not inconceivable that the $649 iPhone might be available to the customer for about $200 with a new 2-year contract.
 
I personally think this discussion may be a mute point. We need info from a reliable source. Historically when analysts put out rumors they tend to wrong.
 
Don't forget contract

Hey Guys

Don't forget that most phone companies charge much less for phones when you take a contract. So even if the prices are true I don,t see how a phone companie could charge 500$ to 1000$ for a phone. For Instance here in Canada we have a 4GB phone for 100$ with a contract of a certian amount years usualy 3 years. So lets wait and see.
 
Or, UK is so far behind. Years ago one yar contract was the norm, now almost no company offers a single year contract.
From a consumers point of view, the US has regressed. From the Telecom providers point of view, things in the US are better.
 
I know the rumors say Cingular, but are there any other rumors that this might be one of the first popularized VOIP cell phones? There was that rumor a while back saying Apple was not going with a carrier, and it would be quite revolutionary for apple to turn the most successful MP3 player into the most successful VOIP cell phone..... don't the markets for MP3 players and consumer VOIP products tend to intersect too? and this would explain the ichat thing...
 
people are forgetting about service providers subsidies, have a look at these - OK add a little for shipping from the UK but not much (~$50) the iPhone really isn't any different to comparable phones (first link) and look at the price of the K800i, a decent highish end phone.

http://www.mobileplanet.com/p.aspx?i=131375

http://www.mobileplanet.com/p.aspx?i=132711

Look, the phone companies are making a killing, and the phone makers are making a killing. Some of these $600 phones cost like $30 to make.

The subsidies are a bunch of bull, they are selling you a phone with a contract at a price that is closer to what you should be paying with no contract and they are still making a killing.

The cell phone industry is a big rip off in my opinion and we continue to buy millions of these phones.

Keep an eye on the cars being driven by the better salesmen at some of the stores, consumers are getting rip-off big time. Any product you make thens of millions of and sell every years is not likely to cost much to manufacture, and if you sell it for 10 to 20 times the cost and then telling them that they are getting a deal with a contract that locks you in to their network, it's outregious. Sorry for the rant.
 
Anyone that thinks these prices are high has no idea how much smart phones cost. If you add WiFi, Bluetooth, a camera, storage, keyboard and all the parts, it can realisticly cost that much.

Look at the prices of smartphones.
 
Everyone is so acclimated to paying $0-50 for a new phone. Remember that most of those phones are just the basics now, and with a contract.

Will we get apple care with the phones too? Or would we pay the provider for their insurance? How about upgrade possibilities? I'm sure the iPhone, like the iPods, will get upgrades every once in a while (usually right after I buy something) after the initial release.


It's also funny how many replys this post got in such a short time! 300 in a few hours! Yikes! Everyone (including me) has an thought. Mostly shock.
 
Too expensive. Cingular only? That's two negative leaning towards flop. I hope the prices are wrong and it's not an exclusive because I won't leaqve T-Mobile to buy an Apple phone no matter how cool or how cheap they lower the price. Cingular is teh suX0rs! (did I type that right? :) )

I agree...
 
Too expensive. Cingular only? That's two negative leaning towards flop. I hope the prices are wrong and it's not an exclusive because I won't leaqve T-Mobile to buy an Apple phone no matter how cool or how cheap they lower the price. Cingular is teh suX0rs! (did I type that right? :) )


If you remember the Razor was waaaaaay too expensive at first ($550 os so) and "Cingular only" for the first year, and they couldn't keep them in stock, but how easily we all forget these things. I'm no Cingular fan but been with them for 3 years and not had even 1 problem.
 
Miss Frunkle, you got bad intel...

One of your ambitious assistants is trying to pass off the "True Video iPod™" rumors as iPhone rumors. That's right, the full-screen-virtual-click-wheel-$649-gadget is actually the 6th generation iPod (BO-ring), not the iPhone.

Not that EITHER OF THESE THINGS ACTUALLY EXIST. But, whatevs, the tech press seems hellbent on reporting truthy things these days... did you hear the one about the iTunes Store's sales crashing through the basement?
 
They must be joking, who will buy this. 4GB iPod nano+phone functionality (sim-free)+apple rip-off factor should add to no more than £180 in this case, and that's what I would consider reasonable (remember it's apple).

But can this report be trusted? Or could this be part of a negative preemptive campaign?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.