Now let's use these reasons for the MacBook Air:
1) The MacBook Air, far from being agile, is dramatically underpowered. It's much less 'agile" than a cheap four-seat car or a cheap, thicker laptop. It will
be much less fun to drive than a normal laptop for half the price.
What the heck are you doing with your laptop that requires "Agility?" Do you take it home at night and ride it like a pony or something? Furthermore, how do you know that it will not be "fun" to drive? Do you own a pre-release or prototype of the Air? If you have used one for more than a month (a general fair amount of time to gain a lasting impression of a product) then I apologize for doubting your opinion of the product. If you haven't, then why is it even feasible to make assumptions about the enjoyment factor of the laptop. Some people use a computer but still like to hug trees and eat organic foods because of the environmental impact, so the fact that this is one of the most Environmentally friendly laptops on the market would indeed make enjoyment factor of the Air much greater for the "Tree Hugger" market.
2) The MacBook Air's footprint is the same as a normal laptop or a "four-set car". You can't fit it anywhere you can't fit a normal laptop, except an envelope. My productivity and "driving pleasure" are SEVERELY REDUCED inside an envelope.
Holy crap!!! You are kidding me? I can't fold it up and put it in my pocket? Personally I think that is a good thing. I am a MacBook owner (not MacBook Pro) and the fact that the footprint is the same (same Screen Size and Keyboard) is a plus in my book. Again, I am not going to rush out and buy one for that fact alone but the fact that I can keep a fullsize keyboard and the 13.3" Screen is awesome. Also, since you seem hellbent on this two seater vs. four-seat car example, lets look at it this way. Say you own a BMW 7-series. But then BMW releases and additional 7-series model that runs on fuel cells so that it is more environmentaly friendly, and it weighs a fraction of the weight of your 7-series. Would you bitch at BMW because it is the same size and the other 7-series? I watched the keynote and the ad's and I don't anything claiming that the footprint was intended to be smaller. Also, how is your productivity reduced? If it is going to be, you dont have to buy one. Finally, you mention your "driving pleasure", again, what the hell are you doing with your laptops?
3) The power/weight ratio of a MacBook Air is almost exactly the same as a MacBook. Not to mention that a 5 pound laptop is hardly a great burden, the number is so small that it's irrelevant. Cutting off two pounds doesn't change anyone's experience in any meaningful way.
Ok, don't buy an Air and keep a MacBook. It seems that all the other manufacturers of Laptops think that getting under the 3 lb mark is important since that seems to be the standard benchmark for their Ultralight laptops (read ultralight not ultra-agile). Also all the other manufacturers get under the 3 lb benchmark with crowded keyboards and smaller screens.
4) The wind will blow through your hair a lot better on a thicker laptop than it will with the underpowered MacBook AIr.
Ahhhh so the blowing adds to the "driving experience". It is more pleasurable when you have a less "agile" blower!
In short, the reasons for a Miata have nothing to do with the reasons for a MacBook Air, and that's essentially because there are no reasons for a MacBook Air at all. This computer will make The Cube look like a great product success.
When the new designed MacBook Pro comes out could you write a review before you use it comparing it to the difference between a Thoroughbred and a Pony? Or maybe between a Shih Tzu and a Doberman? That would be fun wouldn't it?
Ok figured I could start the day with this and maybe it would be better than yesterday. Oh damn, forgot to warn you again iRabbit. Hopefully you were not filled to the brim with coffee prior to the read.
Have a great week people! My pearl of wisdom today is the same as yesterday....If you don't like the product don't buy it. I personally don't like Salmon but don't feel it necessary to post about the downfalls and failures in taste and texture on a culinary board.
I'm out yo'. (hmmmm not as enjoyable as yesterday's "peace out").
Thom