nagromme said:I was a big Doctor Who fan in the 80s--the good, the bad, the cheesy and the just plain weird!
nagromme said:I'll avoid the Dr. Who thread and any spoilers, since I hear Doctors 9 and 10 are pretty good. But I await them on Netflix! And if iTunes had them first, I'd check out a couple early, out of curiosity.
nagromme said:Doctor Who was never what I'd call GOOD sci-fi... not in the sense of consistently combining quality writing, acting, and the whole package... but there was always something about it.... It just can't be compared to other things. I get the sense that the latest seasons may push into consistently good territory, and I'm in some suspense to see if that's true!
clcnyc said:I'm ALL for that!
Timothy said:At first I thought $1.99 was an OK price; now, I'm not so sure.
If you buy a sesons's worth of shows, you are paying as much for that as you are for the DVD box set of the show. And, you are getting significantly lower quality.
With an album purchase, I am generally paying significantly less than I pay for the CD, and the quality is relatively comparable. So, buying albums this way makes a lot of sense to me, and has become the primary way I buy music.
But, this pricing structure discourages purchases of entire collections. It is fine for a show here or there, but if they want me to buy more than that, they need to make the collection price significantly lower than the price to buy the DVD collection.
Lacero said:Any idea if Apple foots the bandwidth bill for all these video downloads? I think costs are deferred with the studios based on amount of traffic. I'd like to sell my own videos on the iTMS, and Apple may pave the way for independent producers.
NickCharles said:NO, iTunes is the name and iTunes is what it should stay. That's the brand. Don't be messing with a succesful brand.
Yeah I wondered the same. I'd really like to see a bittorrent style peer-to-peer built into iTunes, controlled by Apple so keeping the security they want.Lacero said:Any idea if Apple foots the bandwidth bill for all these video downloads?
GregA said:Yeah I wondered the same. I'd really like to see a bittorrent style peer-to-peer built into iTunes, controlled by Apple so keeping the security they want.
yea. that would be awesome, and also maybe some of the old olympic content?Xenious said:Come on Apprentice!
themacman said:yea. that would be awesome, and also maybe some of the old olympic content?
GregA said:That's not to say that iTunes couldn't have 2 distinct modes (tunes vs tv) to capitalise on the name to start with.
JoeG4 said:ZOMG I predict a fully upgradable mini tower portable PC with an dualcore intel processor that'll be 1309827529085257 times faster than any powermac on the market today because of this!
Sorry, are you saying iTunes blocks these out for you?NickCharles said:It already does. It's called your Videos Playlist vs. your Music Playlist.
Once again, you do NOT mess with a successful brand name.
GregA said:Sorry, are you saying iTunes blocks these out for you?
I can't buy videos here so I haven't seen that. I have got video podcasts though, and they are grouped with the music podcasts.
crazyjoeda said:One word, Seinfeld. Every episode, they should have like a complete Seinfeld for like $150.
I do have that playlist. But videos are still incorporated into the rest of iTunes in various ways - it's not like 2 distinct uses (music vs TV). Anyway, we disagree on the value of that, fair enough.NickCharles said:There is a playlist called "Videos" that the application automatically creates. You don't have this?