Steve Jobs is of zero factor in this decision. Business decisions made by multi-million dollar studio houses (especially those branching out on their own - no more Disney) give no regard to emotional loyalties of the CEO. If they do, then Pixar will fail, it is just a matter of when. I am sure Steve recognizes this, and that is why they did not use G4 or earlier Macs for those tasks.ginoledesma said:Most likely since XServe G5s are excellent value for their money, it wouldn't surprise me that Pixar would consider them (ok, ok, Jobs is a big factor there). These days, even Sun has had to admit x86 into their hardware line-up, delegating the SPARC series to their high-end offerings. The G5s are excellent competition to both.
It would be interesting to see just how scaleable and robust Mac OS X + Xserves can be. Big Mac at Virginia Tech's TeraScale computing facility was nice and all, but I'd like to see a real-world, non-academic/scientific-type of work done on a huge farm of Mac-based systems.
This is more of a loss for SGI than a win for Apple. If SGI was actively moving forward, then they wouldn't have lost the business.