At least Apple spent research and development for its os and hardware. Honeycomb is free. No cost to them! Yet they are charging a lot for their tablets!
Listen son, go study up on supply chains and economies of scale and get back to us. Without an understanding of those, you can't possible comment on their prices.
Guess you don't understand my point. Microsoft sells it operating software to manufacturers. Google allows manufacturers to use android free. Apple invested as much or similar to that of Microsoft. Motorola, as an example, don't have a start cost like Apple would. It is like a generic company building upon a brand company's success. Generic company compete with specs on hardware and hopes competing software os is competitive. Motorola is competitive with phones and hope to make money on volume and is not confident in tablet sales. Similar situation except low subsidy or cannot afford to sell it less. Maybe these companies should focus on features like striking better deals with telcos or create cooler accessories like Hp did. Just on raw materials Xoom costs 50 dollar more than iPad 1. So, roughly where does 500 dollar go? How much is profit?
At least Apple spent research and development for its os and hardware. Honeycomb is free. No cost to them! Yet they are charging a lot for their tablets!
Technically, android is free, its open source. Google does charge for the marketplace and in a sense. That's how they control manufacturers from making any material changes to android. You muck too much with the innards with android. You lose the ability to have the marketplace The same can be said with the google apps.No Cost? How do you know that Google is giving away honeycomb for free?
They are probably licensing their OS to their manufacturers.
Guess you don't understand my point. Microsoft sells it operating software to manufacturers. Google allows manufacturers to use android free.
Apple invested as much or similar to that of Microsoft.