Yeah, seriously, it's like they still just don't get it.
We've now got a basic framework in place, and it seems like the main limiting factor now is no longer necessarily technology, but content rights.
If it wasn't obvious before, it should be obvious now - the future can and should be one in which ANY movie or music is available for purchase or rental or streaming or whatever. This idea of only making some stuff available while other stuff is pulled, or having some content at one store but not another, is ridiculous.
There's no reason not to make their entire libraries available; this isn't like old media stuff where you have to decide what to leave in print or let go out of print. If you want to put some restrictions like higher prices for new release stuff, fine, go ahead, but basically what they're doing now is telling consumers "Oh, we've decided this particular movie isn't going to be available to you at this time via this method; feel free to go buy a DVD or wait until we get our heads out of our asses".
We've now got a basic framework in place, and it seems like the main limiting factor now is no longer necessarily technology, but content rights.
If it wasn't obvious before, it should be obvious now - the future can and should be one in which ANY movie or music is available for purchase or rental or streaming or whatever. This idea of only making some stuff available while other stuff is pulled, or having some content at one store but not another, is ridiculous.
There's no reason not to make their entire libraries available; this isn't like old media stuff where you have to decide what to leave in print or let go out of print. If you want to put some restrictions like higher prices for new release stuff, fine, go ahead, but basically what they're doing now is telling consumers "Oh, we've decided this particular movie isn't going to be available to you at this time via this method; feel free to go buy a DVD or wait until we get our heads out of our asses".