Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

weezin

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 20, 2012
409
354
I have (and love) my 30" Cinema Display, partially for its matte screen. My monitor is in the corner of the office, perpendicular to a window (if I look to my right while sitting at my desk, I am staring out the window). I have no issues with glare, reflections, etc at all.

I am thinking about replacing the monitor with a Studio Display and am wondering whether it would be wise to get the nano-texture glass. I don't particularly want to spend the extra cash, but if it's worth it I will.

I use the monitor for work (product management) and photo editing (Lightroom, etc).

To those with the nano-texture - what are the downsides? Would it work reasonably well in my scenario?
 
I have (and love) my 30" Cinema Display, partially for its matte screen. My monitor is in the corner of the office, perpendicular to a window (if I look to my right while sitting at my desk, I am staring out the window). I have no issues with glare, reflections, etc at all.

I am thinking about replacing the monitor with a Studio Display and am wondering whether it would be wise to get the nano-texture glass. I don't particularly want to spend the extra cash, but if it's worth it I will.

I use the monitor for work (product management) and photo editing (Lightroom, etc).

To those with the nano-texture - what are the downsides? Would it work reasonably well in my scenario?
I have two ASDs, both perpendicular to a window - monitors are directly in front of me, window is on the wall to my right.

If I have the brightness down near the lowest setting (or off), I can see the refection of the window from the side. But when the display is at my normal viewing brightness (about 80%), then I get no reflection/glare.

I do have shades I can draw if necessary, but I usually don't.

Depends on how sensitive you are to such things, I guess. But for me, the extra cost of the nano-glass ($400 x 2) would not have been worth it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DotCom2
Thanks for that. I'll see if I can compare these side by side.

As a quick test, I sat at my desk and held my iphone up with the screen facing me, and the reflections were a bit distracting when on. I realize that the studio display is probably brighter (ie less reflections), but I still think I might be annoyed by it. I'll see if I can compare the two. Thanks!
 
Thanks for that. I'll see if I can compare these side by side.

As a quick test, I sat at my desk and held my iphone up with the screen facing me, and the reflections were a bit distracting when on. I realize that the studio display is probably brighter (ie less reflections), but I still think I might be annoyed by it. I'll see if I can compare the two. Thanks!
While still glossy, the ASD does have some kind of coating that helps control reflections. It's significantly better than a plain pane of glass or a 27" iMac.

Just be aware that the nano-glass is very delicate and can be difficult to clean, and does impart a slight blurriness to small typeface sizes. Or so I've read.
 
and does impart a slight blurriness to small typeface sizes. Or so I've read.
This! The nano glass ASD was the most disappointing product I've ever purchased from Apple. I returned it almost immediately. All text felt fuzzy to me, much more so than my Dell U2720's that also have a matte display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: weezin
Thanks all. That makes me skeptical. Maybe I should just stick with my 30"! It's matte, huge, and controls reflections beautifully. If only it had built in speakers and webcam...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.