Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

arn

macrumors god
Original poster
Staff member
Apr 9, 2001
16,414
5,877
Slashdot linked to this Salon article which discusses MPEG-LA's licensing terms and how this opens the market up to cheaper (though less powerful) technologies...

Somewhat encouraging is this quote:

"At the end of the day, MPEG-LA is in the business of marketing a license," says Larry Horn, vice president of licensing and business development MPEG-LA. "If this technology goes totally unused, the patent holders lose out. We have an incentive to get it right."
 
That was my feeling. I hope they will cave and go with Apple's demand which is simply a per codec royalty and not some devastatingly complex and expensive pay per view or pay per stream (which ends up being passed on as a pay per view charge to the end user as Apple correctly noted)..

Oh well, if MP4 doesn't shape up, there will always be Sorenson 4.. ?
 
My experience with MPEG-4 codecs (most of them beta releases, admittedly) demonstrates that MPEG-4 is vastly inferior to Sorenson 3 (and, yes, Sorenson 4 will be even better; just study the quality jump from Sorenson 2.2 to Sorenson 3). Hell, even On2VP3 clearly beats MPEG-4 compression (and I haven't yet gotten a chance to use On2VP4) - and the Salon article clearly admits this.

So my question is - why is everyone desperately clamoring for MPEG-4??? It seems that it is already, even before its dragged-out release, an obsolete codec. Guess it's because it's being hyped as the latest and greatest, when in actual fact it is neither.

Besides, all the licensing/royalty garbage the MPEG group is whining about is an ominous sign indeed.

If you want superior to MPEG-4 compression TODAY, simply download the FREE and OPEN SOURCE On2VP3 codec. It won't cost you a thing and will give better results than MPEG-4. Believe me, I know.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.