Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
MR Criminal Record
- Thread starter MACDRIVE
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well, BV did ban me for 30 days for posting an image of a refrigerator magnet that was for sale on eBay. 🙁
MrSmith
macrumors 68040
Well, did they resemble body parts or something?
Anyway, if MR bought their own parcel of land in Second Life you could have been put in the stocks and we could have thrown things at you. 😎 I'm sure things'll be a lot more lenient here. 😀 Probation for the rest of your life, maybe.
Yes, they're the refrigerator magnet version of the calendar girl. I just now ran a search on eBay's search box under "MAC TOOLS" and I noticed that the refrigerator magnets are still for sale. The girls are a bit racy, but they do have their attributes covered. 😱
GoCubsGo
macrumors Nehalem
LinuXtreme
macrumors regular
Guilty as charged. I'm actually familiar with that line of magnets. My uncle was a mechanic... 😀
bousozoku
Moderator emeritus
xsedrinam
macrumors 601
If you haven't had the obligatory, partial lobotomy as yet, the result of the third infraction, you should be on your way to recovery. MACDRIVE..... Oh, MACDRIVE....why are you staring off in to space?
This is a valid question, since moderator actions tend to be harsher after multiple infractions, with mere warnings more likely for first offenses.
With a bit of research, we can sometimes dig up "dirt" about a member's past infractions. However, if somebody had trouble following the rules years ago, it's likely that it won't have much effect on moderator actions now.
Example:
In other words, time gradually erases old problems, but there's no rule that says they go away completely. I think it's a fair system.
With a bit of research, we can sometimes dig up "dirt" about a member's past infractions. However, if somebody had trouble following the rules years ago, it's likely that it won't have much effect on moderator actions now.
Example:
Person A broke a rule for the first time in 2007.
Person B broke a rule in 2002, then again in 2007.
Person C broke a rule in 2006, then again in 2007.
Even if we happened to remember Person B's history (which would probably be true only if it was a major infraction), we'd tend to treat Person B more like Person A than like Person C.Person B broke a rule in 2002, then again in 2007.
Person C broke a rule in 2006, then again in 2007.
In other words, time gradually erases old problems, but there's no rule that says they go away completely. I think it's a fair system.
bousozoku
Moderator emeritus
sushi
Moderator emeritus
solvs
macrumors 603
Posting short remarks that aren't relevant to the topics on a regular basis can be considered trolling, and is a banable offense.
Special Blood lines have it, we consider us lucky. It becomes more predominate as we get older. I'd write the equation to show you all how this affects us but well I don't to cause brains to explod.
jczubach
macrumors 6502
I just hope you aren't monitoring my downloads😱
have another avatar😀
Not for long. I have an appointment to donate some of it today.
So I'll post one last math comment before all of the numbers have have been drained out of me:
Doctor Q's definition of pi:
If you want to know more about the science of gradually fading criminal records, let's get a physicist in here to talk about half-life decay rates.the ratio of the circumference of a circle to the circumference of a circle that's only one 3.14159....th as big around!