I dont see why not, the superdrive uses the same SATA controller as the hard drive, prob just get one of those custom rails that fits a 2.5" in a superdrive slot.
but why? if you want to do this get the server model and load OSX client on it.🙄
Yes, the late 09 model is the one I was looking at. The reason for 2 as opposed to 1 bigger one is that I plane to use the machine for audio recording and would like to have one hard drive that can be used completely for recording to as this increases performance.
I dont see why not, the superdrive uses the same SATA controller as the hard drive, prob just get one of those custom rails that fits a 2.5" in a superdrive slot.
but why? if you want to do this get the server model and load OSX client on it.🙄
Yes, the late 09 model is the one I was looking at. The reason for 2 as opposed to 1 bigger one is that I plane to use the machine for audio recording and would like to have one hard drive that can be used completely for recording to as this increases performance.
Probably both software and hardware tracks, but not at the same time. The most I could ever see myself doing simultaneously would be 3. The software I would be using would be ProTools 8.
Probably both software and hardware tracks, but not at the same time. The most I could ever see myself doing simultaneously would be 3. The software I would be using would be ProTools 8.
Ok. That should be ok. You would assume a max of 3MB/s per track in the worst case scenario. Should be fine! CPU would be able to handle that too, my core duo MacBook pro decently can do those sort of tasks.