Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Last week he stated that macs are good machines but can't configure them to the extreme like you can with Windows in general.
After reading the thread, I believe you are referring to the respective Operating Systems.

Windows and Mac OS (with it's Unix underpinnings) are both configurable.

Between the two, I would venture to say that Unix has more settings overall.

Ask him to give a few examples, of what he considerd superior on the Windows machine...
That would be a good start.

Many times, not knowing how to do something leaves a person with an impression that it cannot be done. If he shows you specifics, then you can research how to do the same thing with the Mac OS (Unix).

It is unix, you can hack it to the extreme of non-usability.
All too true. :)

OS X is Unix. You can configure the bejeezus out of it, if you're comfortable with the command line. It is orders of magnitude more configurable than Windows.

However, if you're the typical Windows junkie, you'll be lost on a Mac. That's not a lack of configurability, it's a lack of knowledge.
Well put.

The approach between the two OS'es is a bit different.

Both are very configurable. Both have good points and bad points. Some aspect of configuration on a Mac can be done quickly where as it takes a lot more to do it with Windows, and vice versa.
 
I'm a partner in a small consulting company that is also a Microsoft Gold Partner. My specialty is with Microsoft Active Directory and Exchange. Until recently, Windows is the only GUI based OS I have used since 1993.

Like most non-Mac users, I was ignorant. I scoffed at all the fan boys waiting for their iPhones last year and was sickened by the thought of owning one. Then, in August, my wife bought one as a gift for me and I was forced to use it. My eyes immediately opened to the potential of Apple design.

When my mother in law needed a new machine, I did some research and determined that a Mac would be right for her. I learned a lot about the OS while configuring it for her, but found myself in foreign territory and way out of my comfort zone.

After the disaster that was Vista, I decided to try a Mac. What I have discovered is that it won't do everything a PC will do, but what it does do is done very, very well. As the dominant platform, the PC enjoys more participation from the development community and, therefore, more options. I think this will change as Apple continue to builds momentum and market share.

Unfortunately, what makes the PC a more flexible platform is also it's downfall. It's just as easy to write malware as it is to write a productivity app.

As for configuration options, it seems to me that OS X offers more than enough if you know what you're doing. Most of the advanced options you have in Windows are limited to the soon to be retired registry. Both platforms have solid automation platforms. AppleScript is more intuitive, but Microsoft has more options.

While each platform has unique advantages, I believe that the Macintosh is, in every way, what a computer should be. It's a device that lets you focus on productivity and entertainment without worrying about the underlying engine. This can be a boring option for those who like to constantly tinker, and this is why PCs exist.

I have several PCs and a Mac Pro. My Mac has become my favorite, but I can't see myself without a PC.
 
I was under the impression that Windows 7 would retain the registry.

That is correct, but it's on it's way out nonetheless. .Net started that ball rolling by using XML configuration files to store such information. I think the registry will be around for some time, but only in the same way .ini files have been retained. I think its days are number as a viable configuration repository.

Windows 7 is to Vista what Windows 98 was to Windows 95. I think it will make Vista the OS it should have been as well as a few added improvements to keep up with Snow Leopard.
 
That is correct, but it's on it's way out nonetheless. .Net started that ball rolling by using XML configuration files to store such information. I think the registry will be around for some time, but only in the same way .ini files have been retained. I think its days are number as a viable configuration repository.

Windows 7 is to Vista what Windows 98 was to Windows 95. I think it will make Vista the OS it should have been as well as a few added improvements to keep up with Snow Leopard.
I see. Makes sense. Thanks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.