Ok my dilemma is a little different. I already own a 17-inch 1.83 Core Duo iMac but the DVD burner doesn't burn DVDs anymore... everything else is perfect on the machine...
With it starting to break down I've been thinking maybe it's time to pick up a new more peppy computer to edit videos and muck around on photoshop with. I mean the Core Duo isn't bad but it's nowhere near as fast as the 2.4 C2D with the "Santa Rosa" chip set.
But this leads me to my dilemma, ever since I bought the iMac I've wanted a Macbook. The thought of sweet OSX in a tiny box is awesome! But I'm not sure it's the wisest solution for video editing. I was all set to get one since the new specs sound amazing but now the talks of the screen being bad and the gpu being less than up to snuff I'm having second thoughts. I know that video and photo editing doesn't quite require a dedicated GPU to run properly and quickly so would the MB be a doable choice?
Another twist. I'm taking a trip to London early next year and will be doing some photo editing while on the go... now I DO have a laptop... it's a 4 year old Compaq with some doable specs but the thing weighs like 10 pounds which gets quite heavy when you're carrying it around your shoulder for long periods of time. I'm sure a MB would come in handy here.
What do all of you think would be better solution...
Is the better solution for me to get a brand spanking new 2.4 ghz 20-inch iMac use the 10 pounder in London and sell my old iMac or get the 2.2 ghz MB and have a 3rd computer? (I've looked my Compaq can't even sell for 200 bucks on ebay these days... it's a "keeper" now)
Before you say Macbook Pro it's a bit out of my budget range... I can only drop about $1000-1500 and the $1500 mark is VERY stretching it.
Thanks all if you can help!
EDIT:In case any of you were wondering this was my old laptop Compaq R3000Z
With it starting to break down I've been thinking maybe it's time to pick up a new more peppy computer to edit videos and muck around on photoshop with. I mean the Core Duo isn't bad but it's nowhere near as fast as the 2.4 C2D with the "Santa Rosa" chip set.
But this leads me to my dilemma, ever since I bought the iMac I've wanted a Macbook. The thought of sweet OSX in a tiny box is awesome! But I'm not sure it's the wisest solution for video editing. I was all set to get one since the new specs sound amazing but now the talks of the screen being bad and the gpu being less than up to snuff I'm having second thoughts. I know that video and photo editing doesn't quite require a dedicated GPU to run properly and quickly so would the MB be a doable choice?
Another twist. I'm taking a trip to London early next year and will be doing some photo editing while on the go... now I DO have a laptop... it's a 4 year old Compaq with some doable specs but the thing weighs like 10 pounds which gets quite heavy when you're carrying it around your shoulder for long periods of time. I'm sure a MB would come in handy here.
What do all of you think would be better solution...
Is the better solution for me to get a brand spanking new 2.4 ghz 20-inch iMac use the 10 pounder in London and sell my old iMac or get the 2.2 ghz MB and have a 3rd computer? (I've looked my Compaq can't even sell for 200 bucks on ebay these days... it's a "keeper" now)
Before you say Macbook Pro it's a bit out of my budget range... I can only drop about $1000-1500 and the $1500 mark is VERY stretching it.
Thanks all if you can help!
EDIT:In case any of you were wondering this was my old laptop Compaq R3000Z