Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It would be great if this were true.

However, using the long delay as reason for "something great" hasn't proven itself in the past. Simply look at the recent Mac Pro update. Apple took 685 days to create a computer that even they had to admit wasn't really an update.

I'm still holding out hope for a new iMac this month. My guess is still a spec bump with a non-glare display.
 
It would be great if this were true.

However, using the long delay as reason for "something great" hasn't proven itself in the past. Simply look at the recent Mac Pro update. Apple took 685 days to create a computer that even they had to admit wasn't really an update.

I'm still holding out hope for a new iMac this month. My guess is still a spec bump with a non-glare display.

Yes, there is a healthy benefit-of-the-doubt element in this prediction... And not really based on what I personally would want or need, its in the realm of business models to pursue, a possible scenario. But you're right about Mac Pro and hopefully right about the iMac, too.
 
Content: the new BlackMagic Cinema Camera has uncompressed Raw Output exceeding 1080HD... 2432x1366. (aka 2.5k). This is a $3,000 camera and is compatible with Canon DSLR lenses. Many are very excited about this.

That's great and I hope this cuts into the entertainment racket. But I was thinking more of commercial titles.

Surely studios would love to reissue their libraries. Now that we've bought them on VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray... what's next?
 
That's great and I hope this cuts into the entertainment racket. But I was thinking more of commercial titles.

Surely studios would love to reissue their libraries. Now that we've bought them on VHS, DVD, and Blu-ray... what's next?

This may help. A lot depends on the resolution of the camera that shot the film originally. 4k is coming, and basically makes a difference for TVs 55" and larger.

http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57364224-221/what-is-4k-next-generation-resolution-explained/
 
Is there content better than 1080p?

Can Retina deliver 70mm film quality?

3353_image4_large.jpg


Yes, there is better than 1080P, iMax and iMax Dome theaters will blow your face off.

imax1.jpg


Apple can't put that in your house.
 
Last edited:
To your second question. No.

Even 4k can't show all the detail from a 35mm source. It's going to be a long time before any digital format approaches 70mm.

Indeed, I beleive the iMax format ( Flim and digital ) works out to something like 12,600x 8,500ish pixles.

4K is just a bit off.
 
I'd love for there to be the xMac.

I initially held off putting my speculation of the iMac / Mac Pro line which would be a modular Mac system.


You have a base unit which has CPU and integrated GPU, SSD and RAM, then if you want to expand the system, you attach another modular unit to it. Imagine a mac mini units which you stack up. For example, another hard drive just clips onto the bottom. likewise a desecrate GPU unit. the units run through thunderbolt connections.
 
4k will improve 3d playback. So the benefits don't just extend to 55" and above. Plus, I personally believe that 4k would improve the tear that we get on 1080p sets. So I can't accept what the anti 4k brigade has to say until I see it.
 
Things Apple would need to do to bring this to market:
-HDMI in for set top boxes (if people don't want to fully get rid of cable) and gaming consoles plus other things
-A good remote control (like the rumored iPad Mini) with Siri integration
-Expansion, most specifically space for media. This can be done by USB but I have a feeling Apple would push for TB adoption. That means TB cables and accessories need to come down in price and fast

New analyst articles today echo this thinking... paraphrasing a quote from the below link, "the big secret about Apple's TV strategy isn't to sell more TV's but to sell more remotes" aka iPad Mini.

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/is-this-where-apples-tv-adventure-goes-next.html/

Another headline on the stock ticker this morning, I failed to grab, indicated the size of the video market was bigger than the music market.... No mentions of iMac being a part of the product solution set... this is not to artificially puff up my wacky prediction, but clearly Apple is not done attempting to redefine the TV space.
 
Did you mean to post in the bodybuilding dot com Misc forum per chance?

You know, I appreciate the unintended irony in your post. Do you see it?

Here's an exercise, stop stereotyping people and see if you post still makes sense.
 
You know, I appreciate the unintended irony in your post. Do you see it?

Here's an exercise, stop stereotyping people and see if you post still makes sense.

I do not see any "irony", a word you probably just made up. I will try that exercise you mentioned though, is it more for the biceps or triceps and does it break my fast?
 
...snip...
But it is smart to reinvent it.
...snip...

Great post, really enjoyed the read.

Regardless of whatever form factor it comes in, there isn't an industry more in need of disruption* than TV. From the awful set top box interfaces, nefarious billing practices such as the bargain advertised rate that doesn't included all the necessary equipment rental and HD up sell charges, to the ridiculous bundles of expensive content, we have to hope that Apple is planning something.

Cable and satellite is such a moribund industry. The democritization of content creation and publishing lays the foundation to upset broadcast TV; an integrated hardware solution integrated with devices most folks already have as controls would sound the death knell.

* promise, last time I cite C. Christensen.
 
Great post, really enjoyed the read.

Regardless of whatever form factor it comes in, there isn't an industry more in need of disruption* than TV. From the awful set top box interfaces, nefarious billing practices such as the bargain advertised rate that doesn't included all the necessary equipment rental and HD up sell charges, to the ridiculous bundles of expensive content, we have to hope that Apple is planning something.

Cable and satellite is such a moribund industry. The democritization of content creation and publishing lays the foundation to upset broadcast TV; an integrated hardware solution integrated with devices most folks already have as controls would sound the death knell.

* promise, last time I cite C. Christensen.
Thank you.

I agree with this. I worked in the cable industry (and have worked in cell phone biz, both on the sales marketing side), and there are some pretty heinous business practices in place based on old monopoly turf defense grounds. Set top boxes should not be gatekeepers, and the monthly equipment leasing rates for them are unnecessary props for a burdensome business model.

And on the content side, I had to represent my small cable company in negotiations with major minor content channels like Espns huge suite of networks, NFL Nework, all the entertainment channels, etc. i saw the pricing models, and understood their objetives. They really do try to squeeze the cable firms, and every year one big faction or another is renegotiating for higher rates... (If you want ESPN you gotta take The Ocho and our sister property E!Mars!!) There is continuous pressure on cable package prices as a result, which on top of monopoly pricing power, really sticks it to the customer. And offering an a la carte cable channel model is just not a money maker for the cable provider, because we had to buy the channel based on "potential viewers across all households". , not the tiny fraction that actually watched it.

A bit off topic and in the weeds from a main Apple blog, but i agree it does present a sector ripe for exploitation with a better business model based on hardware you love to use (and for more than just changing channels), and a content pricing scheme that does not force the customer to pay a full monthly rate for channels he will never watch.

Apple may be able to disrupt this. But the forces on the other side of the table are formidable, entrenched, and politically powerful.

Lets see what happens! Liberate the TV Apple, do it!
 
Last edited:
I am starting to think that the OP has a point here. The addition of a major feature (e.g. Retina display) would be a really good cause for Apple to delay launch of the iMacs.

As far as built-in TV tuner is concerned.. well ... Macs had those available in the ANCIENT 1990s-era Macs, in the years before Jobs returned. Not to mention that even in the 90s, a dozen third party companies sold TV tuner cards for the PowerMacs. So this is not new for Apple. This is just.... "something old made new again".

Apple had the ability to put TVs inside their 1990s-era Macs. They certainly can do it again on their latest iMacs.... if they really wanted to. But do customers really want to pay extra for their iMacs to have a built-in HD TV feature? Maybe as a custom-built-to-order option from the online Apple Store.

----------

I mean it has been total radio silence, and over 500 days since an iMac Update... so some are even wondering if


You people remember when Timmy Cook said that Apple would "double down on secrecy"?

Apparently, he was talking about Macs. And only Macs. Timbo knew that it is virtually impossible for Apple to prevent leaks when it comes to iPhones/iPads. He just knew it could not be done.
 
I don't think the delay could be because of a retina display because those kinds of screens in the 27" form factor are still extremely expensive.
 
I don't think the delay could be because of a retina display because those kinds of screens in the 27" form factor are still extremely expensive.

Agreed. But maybe they don't offer the 27" retina right away like they've done with the MBP. It'd probably piss a lot of people off. Some would buy - others would wait another year for the 27" Retina. Honestly, I don't see this happening, but I guess anything's possible.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.