In my opinion apple has gone bland, in the ambition of making items that work well it has fallen behind stuff that is cool and many things the last 3 years have faltered. Podcast app, maps, antenna, passport, lack of api access, lack of cool features are just one of many things. I accepted the walled garden and i hated android but after using the newer devices i admit Samsung and Google did it first and did it better. Unless Apple makes a drastic change in ios 7 this will be my last ios device. Android did suck but they at least worked hard to catch up and even tho the apps are a bit behind, the features are not. Apple has been too slow and too conservative. I want the apple which went from os 9 to os 10 not the one which went from os 7 to os 8
Anyone feel the same way as me?
I hear a lot of ' oh well iphone works for me ' , well so did os 9 for a lot
Of folks before os x came alone or windows xp before windows 7 came along or Android 2.3 before Android 4 came along
I'm not with you here. Thanks to Apple making RADICAL changes, we got the iPod.For every "I'm gonna leave if they don't make it super duper innovative (even though I have no idea what I mean by saying that)", there will be 10 (or more) people who appreciate them NOT reinventing the wheel on what is currently the most appealing phone on the market.
It appeals to (nearly) EVERYONE. Apple wants to KEEP as many users as it can, while adding as many as they can. They run a very real risk of turning just as many people OFF with a radical change as they do of satisfying people who are almost never satisfied anyway.
Don't like it? Buy that mostly plastic Android and be happy. It's really ok.
I'll stick with the incrementally IMPROVED iPhone (6, 7, 8...), and continue to use a product that lets me keep all my old software and keep a lot of the same peripherals. My resale value will be great, and I will be able to USE everything as fast as I can open the box... with minimal learning curve even on the "new" stuff.
All thanks to Apple NOT making radical changes. Yippie!
I'm on Android 4.1 right now on the HTC One X, I have been using Android for about a year now.
I should have done more research before I switched, my previous phone was an iPhone 4 and I had no idea what I was going to miss when I switched.
A lot of Android users will tell you that custom roms are awesome. They are not, they cause the phone to be more glitchy and buggy than it is worth. I have to run stock rom in order to avoid having random reboots, issues with the camera, radio etc. Meanwhile with an iPhone, you don't have to worry about running or changing roms to make your battery better or to make the phone faster since iOS just works. But if you do enjoy tweaking there is jailbreaking and cydia which will provide you with far more tweaks and mods than you can find for individual Android devices, but that should be obvious because every Android phone will have about 20 developers while all iPhones benefit from developers on all iPhones.
A lot of Android users will tell you that bigger screens are better. I argue that bigger screens are not better if the graphics of the games you are playing is compromised because of the platform they run on and if the apps that you run all look like they don't belong and have ugly layouts. What is the point of the big screen if it's not used by the apps? It would make sense to use the real estate provided by such a big screen to streamline your app instead of relying on menus upon menus. Meanwhile on iOS even if you have a smaller screen, app interfaces tend to show more with less on iOS (everything is useful without a menu button) and app interfaces tend to look more polished because Apples SDK does provide developers with guidelines and layouts for interface development while Google's SDK for Android leaves the developers to design from scratch even the smallest layout while proving guidelines on how to make good apps and hoping that the developers will follow it.
A lot of Android users will tell you that their battery sucks. This is a problem with Android. All apps continue running in the background forever thanks to "real" multitasking. Oh and by the way, this still doesn't allow Youtube videos to play in the background even though the app does run in the background, something that iOS has been capable of for years. On iOS you will never have to worry about an app running in the background without you knowing because that just isn't allowed on iOS. Also apps on Android that fulfill simple functions such as voicemail and DeskSMS need to run the background at all times to be functional. Meanwhile iOS provides hooks for those kinds of apps so they don't have to run in the background to be functional, instead they run when the event they hook is run. On iOS you don't have to download a task manager or an app manager to manage your apps.
The fragmentation of the Android platform makes it near impossible to actually enjoy the benefits of the features provided to you by the OEMs. Let us look at NFC for one example, while anyone would agree that NFC is an innovative feature - if you buy the wrong phone you won't be able to use certain apps that employ the NFC function. One example of this is the Google Wallet app on the HTC One XL. Another example of how NFC is ruined by the OEMs are that often the sharing features relating to NFC are specific to each OEM. So unless you and all your buddies have the same phone from the same manufacturer, have fun not sharing with each-other unless you download a separate app such as Google Drive or Box or Dropbox - of course all of those are available on iOS as well, but you are not required to download them just to share with a fellow iPhone user.
A lot of Android users will tell you that it is amazing that all of their Google services can be synced to their Android phone. What Android users don't realize is that they have to download apps for this to occur, much of the syncing that is done is not actually built into the Android platform. For example it is possible to have Android without any of the Google apps, including the Play Store. Meanwhile on iOS the syncing, with iCloud or even with Google's own services, is native to the operating system. In other words, it does not drain your battery.
Now if we ignore all the issues pertaining to the user experience (the roms, the apps, the screen, the battery life, the features) we can start looking at how Android implements their version of the JVM, dalvik vm. Now there are many things that could be said about this implementation, but I will stick to the fact that it causes Androids GUI and apps to be far less efficient than they could be - an easy way to see this in action is to look at how smooth an iPhone 4, with a single core at 800mhz and 512mb of ram, is in comparison to many of the modern Android phones, most of which run at almost double the iPhone 4's cpu speed with more than double the amount cores and more than double the amount of ram but not double the performance. Simply looking at the scrolling performance or game performance of a 2 generation old iPhone to even the most modern Android phones will show you that iOS capable of doing far more with less.
Oh, and if you buy the wrong Android phone and use a Mac, have fun with transferring files over to your memory stick with adb via a terminal all the time.
If you are a developer and buy the wrong Android phone or run the wrong rom on the right phone, have fun having adb crash on you every 2 hours while you debug your apps.
All the reasons above are why I am attempting to go back to an iPhone 4 with 800mhz single core and 512 mb of ram while I already have a phone that runs at 1.5 ghz dual core and 1 gb of ram. Because one phone everytime you navigate the operating system it feels mechanical, that is - not natural, and there is nothing you can do about it and on the other if stock makes it feel unnatural (which it does not from my personal prior experience) you can tweak everything.
Just ask yourself, how many apps and tweaks are out there for iOS just to tweak the way you switch between apps that you have open (stock which is customizable via auxo, dash, card switcher, switchboard, super switcher, multi flow, quasar, aero), and look at how many choices you have on Android (stock, task switcher.)
For those who care about their web browsing and gaming and complete experience on their phones and don't mind the screen size, it is best to stick with iPhone, for everyone else there's Android.
I'm not with you here. Thanks to Apple making RADICAL changes, we got the iPod.
Thank to Apple making radical changes we got the iPhone. Thanks to Apple making radical changes we got the iPad. Or if you'd like to go back a bit further: thanks to Apple making radical changes, we got the computer mouse.
Apple is doing just fine right now, but I believe - just like the Topic Starter - that iOS 7 needs to be a big upgrade. Those who first got an iOS device in 2011, 2012 or 2013 might still be very happy with iOS 6 and to those people it might not feel stale, boring or old. Why? Because those people, at best, have only used iOS for two years.
I bet, however, that there are still lots of iDevice users from 2007/2008/2009/2010 who feel like Apple has been doing to little on the software front (as in: too little changes in the GUI, little added functionality, etc.).
Apple isn't doing anything radical. They aren't trying out new stuff on the software front. They aren't trying out truly new - at least visible - stuff on the hardware front: for example, take the Retina display. Back in 2010 it was a 'crazy' and extremly 'difficult' thing to create, let alone mass produce: a really thin IPS display with a - at the time - crazy high pixel density. Apple isn't doing that kind off stuff anymore: they are doing safe stuff and the Apple of today won't use technology that hasn't proven itself yet.
The Apple of 2010 - and before - would have been at the front of the line to implement technologies like NFC or LTE. The Apple of today will wait until second or third-generation components of new technologies show up. Personally, I don't really care (yet) about NFC, but it's a petty that Apple isn't pushing for new technology.
I think 2013 will be the year that will show us what kind of a company Apple really is: will they release an exciting new iOS update and exciting new - or even innovative - products, or will they release a boring similar-to-iOS6 iOS 7 update plus iPhones/iPads/iPods with the expected, 'standard-but-nothing-exciting' hardware upgrades (as in: no REAL new features of which you say "I didn't see that coming.")
Also, I guess you all have a point: why should Apple try to improve software (and hardware) and try out radical new things. Research in Motion (BlackBerry) and NOKIA didn't do that and that worked out just fine: they still have the BEST-SELLING and MOST POPULAR phones in the wor... oh, wait.
Yep, sorry, I thought this was a forum. A discussions board or something like that. What was I thinking?If I want to read the New York times I'll go to their website.
Good grief.
What Apple needs is Steve Jobs. Steve used to pretty much crush the competition
What more do you want? I mean sure they can tweak things such as changing default apps and polishing Siri so that it works all the time, but other then things like this I dunno what more could be done.
They won't redesign the iOS in one update because of the 10s of millions of people who uses them, I mean lets forget about us for a second and think about joe consumer and joe consumers mum, they are happy and are not complaining about the lack of features nor are they thinking about innovating the devices, they are must using them as they were intended to be used - in this case as a phone - and it's really just the elitists that do the moaning.
Gesture Typing ( swype built into the OS)
Multi user support rather than one on iOS like they have it on windows and mac OS
App API access to All Android features aka apps are not blocked for competing with Apple apps
Browsers are not limited to only using Safari's webkit rather than their own which means if you can make a call and the OS asks you which service you want to use like Google voice or Skype etc or your own phone service
Bluetooth FILE TRANSFER (common sense)
Ability to set my favorite app AS the default app ( come on there is nothing more common sense as that)
There are dozens more but you asked for a couple and these i typed on top of my head
Get a Note II.
You will be wowed.
I'm not with you here. Thanks to Apple making RADICAL changes, we got the iPod.
Thank to Apple making radical changes we got the iPhone. Thanks to Apple making radical changes we got the iPad. Or if you'd like to go back a bit further: thanks to Apple making radical changes, we got the computer mouse.
Apple is doing just fine right now, but I believe - just like the Topic Starter - that iOS 7 needs to be a big upgrade. Those who first got an iOS device in 2011, 2012 or 2013 might still be very happy with iOS 6 and to those people it might not feel stale, boring or old. Why? Because those people, at best, have only used iOS for two years.
I bet, however, that there are still lots of iDevice users from 2007/2008/2009/2010 who feel like Apple has been doing to little on the software front (as in: too little changes in the GUI, little added functionality, etc.).
Apple isn't doing anything radical. They aren't trying out new stuff on the software front. They aren't trying out truly new - at least visible - stuff on the hardware front: for example, take the Retina display. Back in 2010 it was a 'crazy' and extremly 'difficult' thing to create, let alone mass produce: a really thin IPS display with a - at the time - crazy high pixel density. Apple isn't doing that kind off stuff anymore: they are doing safe stuff and the Apple of today won't use technology that hasn't proven itself yet.
The Apple of 2010 - and before - would have been at the front of the line to implement technologies like NFC or LTE. The Apple of today will wait until second or third-generation components of new technologies show up. Personally, I don't really care (yet) about NFC, but it's a petty that Apple isn't pushing for new technology.
I think 2013 will be the year that will show us what kind of a company Apple really is: will they release an exciting new iOS update and exciting new - or even innovative - products, or will they release a boring similar-to-iOS6 iOS 7 update plus iPhones/iPads/iPods with the expected, 'standard-but-nothing-exciting' hardware upgrades (as in: no REAL new features of which you say "I didn't see that coming.")
Also, I guess you all have a point: why should Apple try to improve software (and hardware) and try out radical new things. Research in Motion (BlackBerry) and NOKIA didn't do that and that worked out just fine: they still have the BEST-SELLING and MOST POPULAR phones in the wor... oh, wait.
Links to quotes of said people expressing those views?
Apple will need to make a 5" or bigger iPhone in the next 12 months to stay in the game for mobile phones.
They have already working on a lighter full iPad, so that is a good news for Apple fans.
No, they won't. The market for huge phones is something they can easily leave to others and still be wildly successful.
Apple will need to make a 5" or bigger iPhone in the next 12 months to stay in the game for mobile phones.
They have already working on a lighter full iPad, so that is a good news for Apple fans.
The average joes ARE complaining. Ever heard of apps? Smartphones are not used primarily as phones anymore, they are internet devices now with general functionality. If you wanted a phone, you can go back to a flip phone which is way less expensive and does calling better than an iPhone.
The average joes ARE complaining. Ever heard of apps? Smartphones are not used primarily as phones anymore, they are internet devices now with general functionality. If you wanted a phone, you can go back to a flip phone which is way less expensive and does calling better than an iPhone.