Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

TheGordo

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Aug 7, 2007
6
0
I got my first 16gig Ipod touch on Thursday September 13th, the first day they were on sale. Unfortunately I had one with a bad screen, I couldn't replace int until today September 24th. My first Ipod touch was skinner than my second Ipod touch, I'm sure of it. I just wish I still had my first one to compare it too. Has anyone else noticed this??????????
 
I got my first 16gig Ipod touch on Thursday September 13th, the first day they were on sale. Unfortunately I had one with a bad screen, I couldn't replace int until today September 24th. My first Ipod touch was skinner than my second Ipod touch, I'm sure of it. I just wish I still had my first one to compare it too. Has anyone else noticed this??????????

Your mind is playing tricks on you.
 
I know you guys think I'm crazy,but I truly do think the newer ones are thicker. Has anyone else who bought one of the first ones and exchanged it for another seen this?
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.jpg
    Picture 1.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 86
Ummmm helloooooooo.....the 16GB is twice the size of 8GB, that's why it's twice as big.

8GB = 8mm
16GB = 16mm

AMIRITE?
 
Umm, specs say both are 8mm thin:)

are you kidding, both are 8mm thick it says it on the site

I was pointing out that they are the same size

I said yes they are replying to a quote saying they are not the same size

I would not give the link to the page saying they are the same thinness and say that they are different.

maybe the yes they are was interpreted at the title.
 
people who responded to this thread sound stupid, that is except for me who called everyone out on their stupidity. :)


Yes it is!
No it's not!
Yes it is!
No it's not!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.