My new iPod touch is thicker than my old one.

Discussion in 'iPod touch' started by TheGordo, Sep 24, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TheGordo macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    #1
    I got my first 16gig Ipod touch on Thursday September 13th, the first day they were on sale. Unfortunately I had one with a bad screen, I couldn't replace int until today September 24th. My first Ipod touch was skinner than my second Ipod touch, I'm sure of it. I just wish I still had my first one to compare it too. Has anyone else noticed this??????????
     
  2. aethelbert macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL, USA
  3. Tycoonguy macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Location:
    Local Apple Store
    #3
    Are you sure? I know the 16G are thicker then the 8G.
     
  4. vanzskater272 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    #4
    no there not
     
  5. wizzracer macrumors 6502

    wizzracer

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    #5

    There all the same size and thickness. I got both right here and there both the same.
     
  6. wakerider017 macrumors 68000

    wakerider017

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Location:
    US of A
    #6
    Your mind is playing tricks on you.
     
  7. davidjearly macrumors 68020

    davidjearly

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    #7
    Yes, yes they are.
     
  8. Tycoonguy macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Location:
    Local Apple Store
    #9
    I could have sworn Jobs said the 16G was a bit thicker. but oh well
     
  9. aethelbert macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL, USA
    #10
    8 and 16GB models are the same 8mm thickness. There's no reason that one would be thicker than the other.
     
  10. TheGordo thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    #11
    I know you guys think I'm crazy,but I truly do think the newer ones are thicker. Has anyone else who bought one of the first ones and exchanged it for another seen this?
     
  11. aethelbert macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL, USA
    #12
    I have a week 38. I've used week 37s. They're the same.
     
  12. FunkyMonkey macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Location:
    Right behind you
    #14
    Thank you!! Some actual proof to this pointless argument!!!
     
  13. trevorlsciact macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Location:
    Orlando FL
  14. squeeks macrumors 68040

    squeeks

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Location:
    Florida
    #16
    why would the 16gb be thicker?

    last time i checked flash memory was all the same physical size...
     
  15. TimJim macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 15, 2007
    #17

    Attached Files:

  16. squeeks macrumors 68040

    squeeks

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Location:
    Florida
    #18
    8mm THIN:D

    lol
     
  17. chrisdazzo macrumors 6502

    chrisdazzo

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Location:
    Colorado
    #19
    this is the most brainless thread i have ever seen.

    they're not thicker, they're 8mm thin, etc.
     
  18. aethelbert macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL, USA
    #20
    It's only a matter of time before this thread takes a trip to the wasteland.
     
  19. tyorke macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    #21
    Ummmm helloooooooo.....the 16GB is twice the size of 8GB, that's why it's twice as big.

    8GB = 8mm
    16GB = 16mm

    AMIRITE?
     
  20. elcerrito494 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    #22
    He has two of them sitting right in front of him. I think he would know...
     
  21. PygmySurfer macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Location:
    Wellesley, ON
    #23
    No, you're not.
     
  22. Schnebar macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 15, 2006
    Location:
    California
    #24
    I was pointing out that they are the same size

    I said yes they are replying to a quote saying they are not the same size

    I would not give the link to the page saying they are the same thinness and say that they are different.

    maybe the yes they are was interpreted at the title.
     
  23. bogman12 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    #25
    people who responded to this thread sound stupid, that is except for me who called everyone out on their stupidity. :)


    Yes it is!
    No it's not!
    Yes it is!
    No it's not!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page