Sweet... Maybe because of the unibody enclosure? Less stuff to interfere with the range.
Sweet... Maybe because of the unibody enclosure? Less stuff to interfere with the range.
I don't think so because the antenna is in the lid next to the screen.
I don't think so because the antenna is in the lid next to the screen.
I also joined my only neighbor's network that doesnt have a PW. I used to always have 1 maybe 2 bars max, but now getting all 4...
You sly bastard haha
My WiFi reception on N is also vastly improved. Nearly double the signal strength.
Macbook White Shell -65db
New MBP -35db
These signal readings are from the same spot in my room.
The aluminum body isn't a factor. The antenna is located under plastic in the hinge, right below the screen, so it's not covered by aluminum.
The design hasn't changed. The antenna is in the same location in all MBP models, including the newest one. I've always had excellent reception from mine. Your environment has a lot to do with your reception (interference from other devices, etc.)That's good, because the reception in the older design that everyone loves sucked big time.
Where do you get these readings? I'm interested in testing my own wireless performance vs. some of my classmates who seem to have GREATLY superior wireless speeds on macbook pro's of the same revision.
The aluminum body isn't a factor. The antenna is located under plastic in the hinge, right below the screen, so it's not covered by aluminum.
The design hasn't changed. The antenna is in the same location in all MBP models, including the newest one. I've always had excellent reception from mine. Your environment has a lot to do with your reception (interference from other devices, etc.)
I was responding to the statement that the new MBPs have the antennas in the plastic covered hinge as opposed to in the lid of the previous generations. I wouldn't think the antenna was still in the lid considering there isn't any plastic edging there and solid aluminum doesn't allow for good reception.
All you have to do is go from a metal MBP to a plastic MB to notice how much the reception suffers from all that metal.
Unibody design would make a better shield: fewer gaps in the shell from screws, edges, etc.Maybe because of the unibody enclosure? Less stuff to interfere with the range.
Slightly thinner case wouldn't do much. Even aluminum foil wrapped around electronics makes for a servicable shield.Is the aluminum shell thinner behind the screen then the last?
I guess you missed my post:Its possible that because of the glass, the bezel is now plastic and the antenna runs up the inside of the lid. No one that I've read of, incl iFixit, has taken apart the lid/display itself.
It does not run up inside the lid. It is fully contained in the hinge, under plastic. That is where it has been in every MBP model.As I said, the antenna has always been in the hinge. It was not in the lid in previous MBP generations.