buying a NAS drive - is synology bad? in the last 2 days, iv ordered the first two parts of my upgrade scheme for how i use my mbp. 16gb RAM and a 256GB Samsung 830 SSD. i don't want to clog up my ssd with data, i want to keep it spacious, un cluttered, free, and low maintenance when dealing with data on it (i.e. easy to wipe and clean install if needed, keep it fast and healthy) now, even if i wanted to keep all my data, i can't fit it all on there. i don't want to spend so much money on a 500gb ssd that could fail either. so its time for a nas. heres my problem: i was set on choosing the Synology DS212 over the QNAP TS-210. but im reading some reviews on amazon (i always read negative reviews) and i'm left concerned. here are some reviews that worry me, and i would like others who have used synology, especially this line of model, to share their experience to either back up these reviews or refute them: "By T. O'Neill (Oxford, UK) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME) This review is from: Synology DS212J 2 Bay NAS Enclosure (Accessory) I am writing this in the vague hope that Synology read these reviews and fix the problem. And it is a massive problem. There is a major bug and that is that the device churns at 100% CPU for several days if not weeks to create thumbnails for all the photos. And without letting it churn away for days on end you can't view thumbnails of the photos on your devices. Search for "thumb.conf" in the synology forums and you'll find all the disgruntled clients. And why no-one has posted this on Amazon directly is a mystery? And don't bother with the HACK that edits the thumb.conf file to stop the unsharpening of the thumbnails or indeed stop the production of the 1280 version altogether because it makes very little difference. My DS212j has been churning @ 100% for 8 hours overnight to thumbnail 330 photos and 55 videos. So that's not even 1 a minute and with 24,000 to go that's going to take 2 weeks! FAIL." Have returned this as unfit for purpose as it will take literally weeks (no, I'm not exaggerating) to index a reasonable number of photos uploaded to it. The problem is with thumbnail generation, which is necessary for the media server or the app called Photo Station to work. There are many people on the Synology forum complaining of this issue. and lastly.. I bought this item thinking I could have a single place for all my photos and music. The story so far is one of massive frustrations and not much success. Putting the drives in is very simple but setting it up is far from plug n play. You litterally have to install each component you want. Eg you want to store and access photos you must install photo station package from the package centre. Trouble is there is nothing to say that's what you must do! There is masses of info on how it works and the more sophisticated stuff like setting up port protocols (whatever that's all about) but almost nothing regarding basics like how to get your files onto the drive. Even loading something simple like music is a hassle at 1st I have been struggling with this drive for a few weeks but it's actually getting somewhere. I keep finding new little tweaks that open up new areas and it's now allowing me to load the way I wanted. If only it was a more plug n play option it would be getting more stars! all of that sounds awful, and really inconvenient. all i want to do, is have a drive that is constantly accessible, like as if it was an external drive plugged in. i'm not looking for any software or special servers to do anything more unless it can do that basic need first. because i just want to store my itunes library and iphoto library etc to a drive, so my laptop is spacious. do i really need to use some software application to pick photos and music? i just want to drag and drop and tell my apps where my files are. please help with any suggestions.