And why do people always comment with "why is this front page news?"Why is this front page news?
And why do people always comment with "why is this front page news?"Why is this front page news?
Picture a hot three way between Jobs, Portman, and some other beautiful woman.
She is hot on that pic. I like her on Closer.![]()
The Social Network focused on a deposition in a legal case...that sure was a boring movie. /s"The biopic, based on Walter Isaacson's Steve Jobs biography, is said to consist of three continuous 30-minute scenes depicting three of Apple's product launches."
This movie sounds like it will be a miss. A movie to miss. A movie to not see. iLike Jobs. iLike Apple. iLike Mac. But the movie sounds boring.
She would be one hot looking Steve Jobs. She's skinny enough to be Steve circa iPhone era.
You realize that publications, media outlets, etc. can and often do touch-up media they use--they can mirror the image, airbrush some parts, etc. It's really got nothing to do with her in particular or anything all that strange that is behind it. Doubt that it happens in the movies as much, and if it does, and it's actually noticeable, then that's something that really falls onto the editor/director/producer/etc. for doing it that way for whatever reason.I'm swearing off Hollywood until some of those people just get over themselves and eat a damned hamburger for crying out loud!
As for Natalie Portman, she's pretty but umm.. here's another one who's mole/beauty mark moves from one side of her face to the other. WTH, do these things have their own legs?
Seriously, just look at the article pic and compare it with the pic in the post above mine and you'll see what I mean. Everybody in Hollywood or the music business all seem to have 'em, those migrating moles.
It would be friggin' DISTRACTING in a movie, so I say "no thanks".![]()
You realize that publications, media outlets, etc. can and often do touch-up media they use--they can mirror the image, airbrush some parts, etc. It's really got nothing to do with her in particular or anything all that strange that is behind it. Doubt that it happens in the movies as much, and if it does, and it's actually noticeable, then that's something that really falls onto the editor/director/producer/etc. for doing it that way for whatever reason.
Talented as she is, I lost great respect for her after she claimed and perpetuated the lie that she had done much of the dancing in Black Swan.
She doesn't look much like Steve Wozniak.
She would be whatever in any role she plays. She was black in fantastic brilliant Swan.
Perhaps she will be Steve's mom.
The surest sign I will never see the film is to cast NP in it. She's not a bad actress, but I just don't care for her.
YES. Finally someone else who saw that....that was HOT. I will go see this now...
She would be fantastic in whatever role she plays. She was brilliant in Black Swan.
She is terrible in whatever role she plays. She was awful in Black Swan.
Can't imagine Michael Fassbender as Steve Jobs .. No resemblance at all...
Yeah, she is HOT. I want her to be Steve Jobs's lover. Doesn't matter if that detail is unfaithful to historical facts - I just want Jobs to make it with Natalie Portman. And I think he would want that, too!
Picture a hot three way between Jobs, Portman, and some other beautiful woman. In the throes of passion, Jobs sudden has a revelation about some product and pulls out, puts on his clothes, and rushes off to Apple HQ.![]()
In this age of political correctness, why can't Steve Jobs be played by a woman? And Natalie Portman at that?