It must be a horrible script and/or switching studios slashed the budget and salaries. And I can't stand Seth Rogan so if I do see this movie, if it gets made, it will be when it gets to Netflix.
Just stating the fats, wouldn't it be true that we will see a "Steve Jobs" movie every year ?
Just like the are doing with the Hobbit.... Even though the movie studios keep forgetting there was one hobbit based on the book, not a million, but lets not go into that small detail. It's all about the money.
I reckon we're gearing ourselves up for more than one Steve Jobs movie .... so get ready...
If you thought the movie "Jobs" was bad, u probably haven't seen anything yet.
Why does Sorkin need these overpaid celebrities anyways?
I mean . why does he need an actress like Natalie anyways? Does he need her to do a nude scene?
The comment was above your pay grade.
It must be a horrible script and/or switching studios slashed the budget and salaries. And I can't stand Seth Rogan so if I do see this movie, if it gets made, it will be when it gets to Netflix.
What is it about this movie ?
![]()
Meanwhile, at the MacRumors analytics team meeting...
Arnold: Hmm, I wonder why our post got so many views!
Husain: Probably due to my fantastic article.
Eric: Well it can't be because of the Jobs movie idea. Everyone is sick of that.
Juli: Guys, it's obviously because we put a picture of a girl up there.
Team: Ooohhhhh...
What is it about this movie ?
![]()
I would give up by now.
----------
By the time it gets made, it will star Betty White and Jack Nicolson and consist of three scenes about the last month of Steve Job's life.
this thing will never get made. It is poison to everyone who reads the script.
At what point does somebody decide to can this movie altogether?
This seems to be falling apart every step of the way. I doubt it'll ever get off the ground
This movie should just be shelved at this point.
I think a movie made about the drama of this Sorkin movie would be more entertaining
"Obviously"? Because it can't be because of tons of other more typical and not so unusual reasons, like not being able to agree on the money, scheduling conflicts, etc.? The only obvious thing is that it's unclear so far.
----------
Assuming they do just those in real-time, it might be kind of odd and tricky, although it'd be interesting to see what that would look like. If not so much in real time, but just concentrating on those launches as the center of it all, it could go in all kinds of different places--after all, The Social Network was mainly centered around a deposition.
It must be a horrible script and/or switching studios slashed the budget and salaries. And I can't stand Seth Rogan so if I do see this movie, if it gets made, it will be when it gets to Netflix.
The amount of turn-downs by A-list actors is pretty staggering, because they love nothing more than playing a juicy dramatic role to reign in the the awards. So it really points to something being very wrong with the production.
Because it's a pointless movie and not many people care.
Let's move on already.
Yeah... I don't understand the concept of highlighting 3 product launches either.
I heard that they were focusing on the 30 minutes prior to each product launch... in real-time. Sorkin has always done pretty cool things with dialog, timing, movement, etc. So it might be neat to see the action unfold backstage.
But in the end... it's still three 30 minute segments about a guy who had a 30 year career.
I'd actually love to have seen the craziness that was taking place backstage before the iPhone launch... but I don't think it merits a Hollywood movie.
I think the movie studios and actors are realizing that too...
just like other than Facebook fans, there's not much consumer interest to see such a movie about Facebook .........its not a project anyone seemingly wants to do, and other then apple fans, I don't think there's much consumer interest to see such a movie.