Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am surprised how 'slow' the Verizon network is. In my area, ATT and Sprint are bad for dropped calls.

Glenn
 
You mention that all carriers get dropped calls. That's true, but there's certain carriers that are clearly better in that category, and Verizon has been known to be king according to several different surveys and tests, for quite some time now.

And last, AT&T customers are more "loyal" to the iPhone because AT&T has had a 4 year exclusive to it, and more people are in contracts already with the iPhone, and after 4 years, many just decided to stay.

If you want to look at facts.....Verizon overall, has had the lowest churn in the U.S. wireless history for at least the past 5 years.

:eek: Verizon has the lowest churn in history with the iPhone exclusive to AT&T for most of those 5 years? UH, You have to show the facts rather then declare them. Verizon users didn't bail for the iPhone and AT&T users didn't stay on AT&T to keep the iPhone for the last 5 years? I find that IMPOSSIBLE to believe and totally not credible with the iPhone being the fastest groaning phone ever.

AT&T customers are loyal for many reasons and if you read the last couple weeks of replies to these type of stories on MacRumors, you will see that MANY people like AT&T. Many people have had the opportunity to leave but realized the downgrade in data service was not worth the minimal difference in dropped calls (in a few markets).

As far as some carriers better than others at dropped calls, I agree. This article shows a .7 calls out of a 100 difference between AT&T and Verizon. It also shows that some data networks are better than others. This article shows that AT&T is 3x as fast for iPhone users. It's exactly what I said. Take your pick.... Want a much faster and feature rich network for iPhone users, choose AT&T. Want better dropped call rate (.7 POINT 7) percent, choose Verizon.

What is the primary purpose of your iPhone?
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

In Chicago AT&T sucks. Slow as molasses!!
 
When the O.G. iPhone launched on AT&T = voice
2011/2012 = data, which AT&T kills the competition

Because the study is flawed....

Does it compare an Iphone to a Thunderbolt on Verizon?

The study is for "fastest Iphone in a few colonial cities", not "fastest smartphone".
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

In Chicago AT&T sucks. Slow as molasses!!

Not for me, guess it depends where you are in Chicago.
 
Because the study is flawed....

Does it compare an Iphone to a Thunderbolt on Verizon?

The study is for "fastest Iphone in a few colonial cities", not "fastest smartphone".

It's not flawed. It's comparing who the iPhone is fastest on. And any comparison between an iPhone 4S and a Thunderbolt would be JUST as flawed. If you want to go that route compare a Samsung Galaxy SII Skyrocket on AT&T to a Motorola Droid RAZR or something on Verizon. Which wins will depend on the city. But that's apples to apples. Two LTE phones.
 
Has to be a phone issue because I have been with sprint for 8 years and I may get 1 dropped call every 3 to 4 months.

As one data point, nothing can be drawn by your success or lack thereof. That's like determining the United States is 100% diabetic based on one test subject.
 
Problems

SOOOO many problems with this. First, where did they conduct this test at? How far away from cell towers, respective to the company? What time of day? What were they downloading? How long did these calls last and were they across services or did they call to the same service provider? What are the limitations of their study? ....Point is this is not a very well done study, if anything I'm sure you can find information showing that they were paid to do this "study" by a subsidiary of AT&T.
 
Opinions

After reading a lot of the comments left, I think you all are over thinking the issue of customer loyalty. The average joe does not think about the facts of speed, dependability or any of these logical thoughts based on actual statistics that is out there for them to research. The average joe is interested in popularity and costs. If AT&T is the popular choice and offers them a deal, than they will go for it especially if they throw skewed numbers and results in their face I (over load them with information) and pressure them into signing a contract. It is true with ALL carriers and in sales period. That is not to say there are a few of us out there that do look at these things, but you need to remember that you, as an individual, should prioritize what you want based on what you intend to use the phone for, for how long, ect.; not what carrier tells you. Take a few days, do a little research, after you figure out what your priority is, as to what is the best in your area. F this popularity crap, do what is best for you.
 
SOOOO many problems with this. First, where did they conduct this test at? How far away from cell towers, respective to the company? What time of day? What were they downloading? How long did these calls last and were they across services or did they call to the same service provider? What are the limitations of their study? ....Point is this is not a very well done study, if anything I'm sure you can find information showing that they were paid to do this "study" by a subsidiary of AT&T.

There isn't even a need for a "study" at all.

You can easily go outside and see: Grass is green, Sky is Blue.

You can just as easily run a speed test anywhere in the country and find out: AT&T has blazingly fast 3G data, and Verizon and Sprint both have horrible, disgustingly slow data.

Not one single person who cares about data speed has ever purchased a Verizon or Sprint smartphone. Oh plenty of people buy them, but none that care about the speed of their data plan. NONE.
 
There isn't even a need for a "study" at all.

You can easily go outside and see: Grass is green, Sky is Blue.

You can just as easily run a speed test anywhere in the country and find out: AT&T has blazingly fast 3G data, and Verizon and Sprint both have horrible, disgustingly slow data.

Not one single person who cares about data speed has ever purchased a Verizon or Sprint smartphone. Oh plenty of people buy them, but none that care about the speed of their data plan. NONE.

And from which oraface did you pull this "study" out of, hmm? Because I highly doubt that you went around to a significant amount of people asking their reasons for selecting one provider over another.
 
Don't forget about T-Mobile

I've done a few comparisons, and, in my area(s), T-Mobile's data is faster (9-12 Mbps download speed) than AT&T (1.5-7.x Mbps). Can replace DSL as long as you don't exceed 2 GB limit (but then, can't do that at all on the AT&T account). Too bad no iPhone on T-Mobile. iPhone definitely has a better UI than Android. There are an awful lot of iPhones around here, and, the speed of data downloads is pretty variable on AT&T, while, T-Mobile has been very steady. Probably because there aren't as many T-Mobile users. YMMV.
 
There isn't even a need for a "study" at all.

You can easily go outside and see: Grass is green, Sky is Blue.

You can just as easily run a speed test anywhere in the country and find out: AT&T has blazingly fast 3G data, and Verizon and Sprint both have horrible, disgustingly slow data.

Not one single person who cares about data speed has ever purchased a Verizon or Sprint smartphone. Oh plenty of people buy them, but none that care about the speed of their data plan. NONE.

Meanwhile, any Droid user with Verizon LTE is laughing at everything you just wrote.

Congrats, your AT&T 3G is the winner. It's like winning a car race made up of Yugos.

----------

Why all the posts about this not being fair, and a 4G phone should have been used, etc.

This is clearly an article about speeds and voice on the iPhone, and no other product. It is not a statement about which network has the highest possible speed if you are using the right type of phone.

And as an airline pilot, It would be hard to get to more cities (big and small) on an annual or monthly basis than I do. My ATT iPhone has done just fine. Certainly it has dropped calls, as did my Verizon phone I switched from. But never, absolutely never, have I been in a US city that I could not connect with data or make a call on ATT.

I guess you haven't been in downtown San Francisco in any high rise since the iPhone came to market.
 
I care about data speeds. That's why I got on Sprint 4G before anyone on AT&T.

Sprint 3G sucks, but I've learned to just use WiFi. I'll probably pick up an android LTE phone next year once sprint starts rolling that out.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.