So it is better for these kids to be tracked by some no name Canadian company? iOS devices are trojan horses.
This comment is nothing but a straight up lie.
So it is better for these kids to be tracked by some no name Canadian company? iOS devices are trojan horses.
Oh I understand and agree with these general concerns. I was mainly looking for a few examples with some measurable outcomes.See post #43 above. The evidence we have is that this kind of thing will have a modest impact. The question, though, is whether that impact justifies the money relative to other initiatives that might be undertaken, such as hiring more teachers or providing better salaries for teachers so that they are truly valued as the professionals they are.
Let me put it this way: What do iPads solve that books, good verbal teaching, and interacting directly with students does not? The University I work at is over half a millennium old, and when I hear the pro-IT guys spout off about the benefits of these machines to education I think 'My god. How did we ever survive the last 500+ years without IT?'.
toying with iOS.
The iPads are not free. Somebody is paying for them.
Off subject a bit, but a quick look at your link would seem to show that "Barnett Formula" being a bit of a ripoff for England.That will be the British taxpayer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnett_formula
Glasgow is a terrible place. It needs all the help it can get. Send donations people!
Also fwiw, I'm Canadian and very familiar with CGI. They're huge and I've had a few friends who worked for them. They are vile scum, if they're involved it's safe to assume they're massive corruption and kickbacks going on.
If you goal is to train them to be an office drone, then Windows 10 and Office might be appropriate, for some sort of vocational training. If you're trying to teach them to think, to learn, to understand how a computer works, and why, a Raspberry Pi (the "i" is not capitalized, it's not an acronym) is a fabulous, and extremely cost-effective tool. Learning Windows only teaches you how to work with Windows. And plenty of offices don't use Windows these days.Raspberry PI? Why saddle them with that underpowered piece of junk. Just give them Windows 10, Office and be done. You know, "real" tools for "professionals" who do "real work."
Couldn’t happen in America... some mindless GOP’er would start complaining about his tax dollars
If you goal is to train them to be an office drone, then Windows 10 and Office might be appropriate, for some sort of vocational training. If you're trying to teach them to think, to learn, to understand how a computer works, and why, a Raspberry Pi (the "i" is not capitalized, it's not an acronym) is a fabulous, and extremely cost-effective tool. Learning Windows only teaches you how to work with Windows. And plenty of offices don't use Windows these days.
(Your last sentence is either quite sarcastic, or written by someone who doesn't know what quotation marks mean.)
£300 million does seem to be quite a lot of money for £12 million worth of iPads.Usually the case with Glasgow City Council:
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/17693008.glasgow-council-corruption-dossier-is-handed-to-police/
The councillors use a technique called arms-length companies which allows them to pay themselves or their friends high amounts for contracts and keep it all secret. One day it'll all be exposed and I've heard almost everyone in the council is in on it.
This deal has all the hallmarks of this scam since it was awarded illegally:
https://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/new...-council-illegally-awarded-it-contract-to-cgi
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news...al-to-foreign-firm-is-a-betrayal-of-scotland/
Audit Scotland said that 97 staff employed by CGI had actually been hired by a senior CGI director through his recruitment company.
Glasgow is a terrible place. It needs all the help it can get. Send donations people!
But the article didn't say that the £300 mil was only for the iPads. It said the iPads were part of a larger deal. Presumably it's a whole bunch of things (they also mention putting in WiFi infrastructure, but one would expect there's a lot more than that).£300 million does seem to be quite a lot of money for £12 million worth of iPads.
Free? Free? Nuttin' ain't free. Either the Scottish taxpayers will be on the hook or we, the consumers of Apple products, will end up paying for Apple's "generosity" by paying slightly higher prices for the things we buy. Nuttin' ain't free.
Based on what exactly?Glasgow is a terrible place. It needs all the help it can get. Send donations people!
Frankly as an educator in a university I think that there is nothing magical about using technology like iPads to teach. Most students and most teachers will use the iPads as interactive books and nothing more. Also, I don't think the future holds much promise for refining IT-based teaching. Conveying knowledge in person verbally has worked efficiently and well for our entire history, and interposing computers in that interaction is no panacea. Lectures and teacher-led talks might bore some, but the purpose of education is conveying knowledge and skills, not entertainment. There is an inverse relationship between course evaluations by students and their actual academic performance. If educators start seeing their mission as entertaining students, then teachers and students will simply conspire to dumb things down even more than they are now.
If I hear one more clueless manager spouting off about how IT will solve everything I am going to lose it - at best the effects of using IT are smallish. In one meta-analysis there was about half a standard deviation improvement in academic achievement (see link) - detectable, but modest, and £300 million would but a lot of teachers. I am a US citizen living in Scotland, say maybe it's not my place to offer an opinion, but I do pay Scottish taxes. I wonder if this is really worth it. I don't mind the money being spent - I just wonder if this is its best use.
Based on what exactly?
I am biased, but I would suggest you are ignorant.
Please explain.Wrong. English taxpayers will be paying for it like they do everything else in Scotland and Wales.
I think even the "unfair outdated reputation" label is outdated.I have worked in Glasgow and it is nice enough. It is not my favourite place to be but there are certainly many worse places in Britain than Glasgow and I think it has an unfair reputation.