Before commenting, I will say that I was with AT&T 4 months before I had the iPhone. In fact my original plan was NOT to get an iPhone (
originally, I was a
hater). In both the 4 months before and since I've gotten the iPhone, my coverage has been good in New Jersey (North, Central, South), DC, Baltimore, NYC, Philly, Rochester, Pittsburgh, and Boston, and all major roadways to each of those points.
I've also had excellent coverage in Miami, New Orleans, Austin, Houston, and El Paso. Though I didn't drive to those places.
This statement makes no sense, for two reasons:
1. You can jailbreak/unlock an iPhone and go to T-Mobile, and
2. If you're not getting good voice coverage, you will
definitely not get good data performance. It will be intermittent at best, with frequent timeouts. I'd say that would be even more frustrating than have bad voice coverage.
In 2005 I paid a cancellation fee to Sprint to move to Verizon.
In 2007 I paid a cancellation fee to Verizon to move to AT&T.
If AT&T did me wrong, I'd have no problems paying the ETF and moving somewhere else again. The iPhone costs more than the ETF. And it's not that hard to eBay an iPhone to help defray the costs of porting out while in contract.
Well, I've been with all of the big three, so I don't fit that mold. But I would think most people realize that dropped calls and no bars of service is a bad thing. And people you talk to on the phone WILL complain if you sound bad (I learned this on Sprint and Verizon).
Kinda hard to be uninformed about that.
Most people universally point to Sprint as the loss leader for pricing. AT&T's price plans are nothing to shout "WOW! WHAT BARGAIN!" over.
Then again, most people who flock to Sprint over price soon realize you get what you pay for. Sprint is the cheapest for voice and 3G data, yet they've been steadily losing customers over the past year. Yet AT&T doesn't even compete on price points with Sprint and has been gaining more subs than either Sprint or Verizon. And no, not all of it is because of the iPhone, particularly the past quarter when iPhone sales dropped off yet subscriber gains were still on track.
Wonder why that is?
An Apple product user - on THESE forums - who is
passive? Do i even NEED to point out the obvious fallacy here?
Sounds like you're accusing other people of doing what
you did: pick a phone over the service. And now you've got a serious case of sour grapes over it.
I'm not going to say that my experience is indicative of EVERYONE'S experience. But I will also say that your experience certainly isn't either. Cellular service on every carrier will be hit or miss for everyone.
It's also not true that just because someone says they're getting good service on AT&T, they MUST be an AT&T fanboy, or in denial because they love the iPhone so much. As someone who obviously has a loyalty to Verizon, anyone
could play easy pickins' and accuse you of shilling for Verizon, just as you accuse others of shilling for Apple/AT&T.
I prefer to think though, that you just had a bad experience based on your unique usage scenario, and have had a better time on Verizon. These things happen, and no carrier is perfect for everyone. If there was a perfect carrier, then the US wouldn't need four of them nationwide, plus a smattering of regionals and MVNOs.
Sorry you had a bad go of it on AT&T and couldn't enjoy your iPhone. But please don't accuse those of us who enjoy both just fine of anything untoward.
And, please don't be so bitter. At the end of the day, it's just a phone: a hunk of plastic, metal and glass. It's not the end of the world because you don't have THAT particular hunk of plastic, metal and glass.