Interesting reading all the comments about 8GB being insufficient. I stumbled across some Neo videos while scrolling through Instagram, results are impressive. I think 8GB is enough for it's intended use now and well into the future.
I’m coming from a 2019 Intel MBP with 8GB RAM. It’s never been an issue and that’s with a tiny 128GB SSD, mostly full, so swap was limited.Kinda reminds me of how sure some people were Neo would come with 12GB or 16GB. Because anything less would be unusable.
Somehow, MBA survived with 8GB base for M1, M2, and M3. But Neo wouldn't survive with 8GB? My bet is Neo 2027 will stay with 8GB.
Yes, agree - 8GB is just fine for most people who are not power / pro users / influencers / editors / etc....Kinda reminds me of how sure some people were Neo would come with 12GB or 16GB. Because anything less would be unusable.
Somehow, MBA survived with 8GB base for M1, M2, and M3. But Neo wouldn't survive with 8GB? My bet is Neo 2027 will stay with 8GB.
I have been monitoring my Neo RAM usage with over 50 tabs open, FCP running, and SQL database management - all while using up around 6.5GB out of 8GB.I have long been a defender of 8GB being adequate, but note the the Ars Technica review and this post show memory pressure in the yellow quite a lot. The machine functions perfectly well being in yellow, and the majority of Neo users will never be aware of it, but as Apple says about yellow memory pressure:-
...which is a bit disingenuous because you can't actually give it more RAM! But unsurprisingly it does indicate a lack of headroom.
- Yellow memory pressure: Your computer might eventually need more RAM.
Kinda reminds me of how sure some people were Neo would come with 12GB or 16GB. Because anything less would be unusable.
Somehow, MBA survived with 8GB base for M1, M2, and M3. But Neo wouldn't survive with 8GB? My bet is Neo 2027 will stay with 8GB.
I read the review and he admitted to using the Neo the same way he uses his M3 MBA with 24GB of RAM. He used the Neo in a manner that the intended audience won't (as a whole) and then made a cautionary warning about the Neo having 8GB of RAM. That kind of behavior and writing, along with him thinking that benchmark tests give a very good overview of actual user use told me that 1) he was essentially writing from the expectation of a non Neo user while at the same time, undermining the actual performance and intended use of the Neo. In other words, I found the article to be no better than the typical YT revenuer who continually creates videos pitting everything against the MBP. And in that light, the article and the videos don't really mean anything to me as a user.I have long been a defender of 8GB being adequate, but note the the Ars Technica review and this post show memory pressure in the yellow quite a lot. The machine functions perfectly well being in yellow, and the majority of Neo users will never be aware of it, but as Apple says about yellow memory pressure:-
...which is a bit disingenuous because you can't actually give it more RAM! But unsurprisingly it does indicate a lack of headroom.
- Yellow memory pressure: Your computer might eventually need more RAM.
Why is everybody so sure there will be a 2027? If NEO is not an instant hit then there might not be a 2027. And every year is too much anyway. Maybe not for phones but for laptops it is.Kinda reminds me of how sure some people were Neo would come with 12GB or 16GB. Because anything less would be unusable.
Somehow, MBA survived with 8GB base for M1, M2, and M3. But Neo wouldn't survive with 8GB? My bet is Neo 2027 will stay with 8GB.
Why would a spec bump every year be too much? Spec bumps are really meant to encourage and entice new buyers to the Mac world, not Apple nerds on MR to get a new Mac every year.Why is everybody so sure there will be a 2027? If NEO is not an instant hit then there might not be a 2027. And every year is too much anyway. Maybe not for phones but for laptops it is.
What do you mean, swapping and paging do not depend on unified memory in any way.Not worried as the SSD will swap with unified memory.
Why is everybody so sure there will be a 2027? If NEO is not an instant hit then there might not be a 2027. And every year is too much anyway. Maybe not for phones but for laptops it is.
If it was that good, Apple would have continued to sell the MBA with 8GB RAM.
2027 will be 12gb ram. 2028 will be 16gb ram. 2029 will be 20gb ram. 2030 will be 24gh ram. There is no end to it then. But every year is a lot. 8gb will be good enough for couple years.Why would a spec bump every year be too much? Spec bumps are really meant to encourage and entice new buyers to the Mac world, not Apple nerds on MR to get a new Mac every year.
Ars Technica reviews are not written for the Neo target market. The vast majority of Neo users will not read Ars Technica and never look at memory pressure or experience problems. Ars Technical reviews are written for enthusiasts and there are plenty of them buying Neos, even though a small minority.I read the review and he admitted to using the Neo the same way he uses his M3 MBA with 24GB off RAM. He used the Neo in a manner that the intended audience won't (as a whole) and then made a cautionary warning about the Neo having 8GB of RAM. That kind of behavior and writing, along with him thinking that benchmark tests give a very good overview of actual user use told me that 1) he was essentially writing from the expectation of a non Neo user while at the same time, undermining the actual performance and intended use of the Neo. In other words, I found the article to be no better than the typical YT revenuer who continually creates videos pitting everything against the MBP. And in that light, the article and the videos don't really mean anything to me as a user.
It was informative in many areas. I just didn't find it as balanced as I thought it should have been.Ars Technica reviews are not written for the Neo target market. The vast majority of Neo users will not read Ars Technica and never look at memory pressure or experience problems. Ars Technical reviews are written for enthusiasts and there are plenty of them buying Neos.
I suggest that the target readership of Ars Technica reviews are more interested in a thorough technical review which explores the machine's full capabilities, rather than just how it is for a typical target Neo user. I found the Ars review very balanced and informative, as usual.
It may get the non-Pro A19 or a version of the A19 Pro with 8GB.Kinda reminds me of how sure some people were Neo would come with 12GB or 16GB. Because anything less would be unusable.
Somehow, MBA survived with 8GB base for M1, M2, and M3. But Neo wouldn't survive with 8GB? My bet is Neo 2027 will stay with 8GB.
The way this machine tears down so easily and the logic board is so easily remove leads me to believe Apple plan on maintaining it.Why is everybody so sure there will be a 2027? If NEO is not an instant hit then there might not be a 2027. And every year is too much anyway. Maybe not for phones but for laptops it is.
This is important for my workplace!The way this machine tears down so easily and the logic board is so easily remove leads me to believe Apple plan on maintaining it.
It’s very modular. Can strip it in about 6 minutes.