Hey guys,
Does anyone know if a 4k Netflix app for the Ipad Pro is in the works? I hope sodata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
Thanks,
rambosamboo
Does anyone know if a 4k Netflix app for the Ipad Pro is in the works? I hope so
Thanks,
rambosamboo
Hey guys,
Does anyone know if a 4k Netflix app for the Ipad Pro is in the works? I hope so
Thanks,
rambosamboo
incorrect. it may not be a 4k device, but it's far higher than 1080p device, so 4k streams would be beneficial.The IPP is not a 4K device that can take advantage of a 4K stream.
But there is no point offering 4K streaming, it is just waste of resources and bandwidth. The most they *might* offer is 2kincorrect. it may not be a 4k device, but it's far higher than 1080p device, so 4k streams would be beneficial.
But there is no point offering 4K streaming, it is just waste of resources and bandwidth. The most they *might* offer is 2k
I think you have posted this before, and I don't agree with it at all.
Firstly, Netflix provide the service in SD, HD and 4K. There is no intermediate offering.
Secondly, it is better to start with too much information and reduce down, than starting with too little. I don't know why you say "waste of resources and bandwidth". If you have a fast enough broadband connection and you have paid for the service, what exactly is being wasted?
Thirdly, 2K is still not sufficient anyway and only a fraction better than HD. 2K resolution is a DCI standard and is 2048x1080.
Finally, the vertical resolution of an iPad pro is 2048 pixels. A full 4K vertical resolution is 2160 pixels. There is hardly any difference so virtually nothing would be "wasted" considering vertical resolution. For horizontal resolution there is more of a difference of course with 2732 pixels on the iPad pro vs 3840 for 4K, putting it firmly in the middle between HD and 4K. 2732*2048 = 5.6 million pixels. 3840*2160 = 8.3 million pixels. 1920x1080 = 2 million pixels. So the iPad pro has 2.8 times the number of pixels of HD, and 67% of the pixels of 4K. For sure a proper 4K stream with intelligent downscaling would make a clear and visible difference.
I also remind others of the clear advantage Panasonic ED plasmas had when fed an HD stream vs an SD stream, and their resolution was only 853x480!
4. You are being ridiculous here. Yes, iPad has 2048 pixels vertically, but that is because of its aspect ratio. If you stream a 4K video to iPad pro, it would take full 2372 horizontal pixels, but vertically it will only 9/16*2372, that is 1334 pixels. The rest will be just black bars on the top and bottom of the screen. So, the 4K stream on an iPad pro will actually 2372*1334, otherwise all the pictures will be weirdly tall.... You don't want this. And this is even lower than 1440p.
So if you can't even take full advantage of 1440p, what's the point of pushing 4K?.
I agree about the aspect ratio but you have cropped a lot of pixels in your calculation. Horizontal is 2732 not 2372.
So just to correct your numbers, vertical would be 1536 pixels. So it is still more than 1440p. But as I said earlier, Netflix, to my knowledge have nothing inbetween HD and UHD as a service offering and it is better to start with too much and scale down than start with too little and scale up as has been shown many times with TVs like the Panasonic ED plasmas.