What's silly to me is not display preference. What's silly to me is paying the same price for a lesser machine.
"the 24" is a far nicer display than the 20" period. It's not taste, it's fact"
... "this is fact because I say it is fact" is the circular logic of a nine-year-old. That you are an adult does not actually make it less circular, or more true. It's not fact; it's your opinion.
And my opinion is: the 20" display on the $1200 iMac is a much nicer display than the one on the $1200 mini.![]()
To each his own. I doubt there a single person that would tell you the 20" is better than the 24", regardless of size. But I guess it's all moot now, since 6GB doesn't appear to be possible. That would drop $330 from the price, and you could have a nice 24" Matte monitor for that much. Where in you'd have your Mac Mini, w/ a larger monitor than the 20" iMac!
And honestly, it's not just fact because I say so, the panel is actually superior.