aykew said:After getting to play with one of the new 1.8 today at my friendly local retailer (an Apple reseller, but not an official store), I think I've finally made a firm decision... the new one it is!
It's pretty unlikely I'll ever need more than 2GB of RAM or the PCI-X slots. I'm upgrading the drives (I'm using the money I saved by going with the old model to do a .5TB Raid 0 ) so that doesn't bother me. The big deciding factor was always performance. My big question was "did Apple cripple the performance on the new 1.8 vs the old one?" I'm happy to say, the answer appears to be "no".
I ran XBench (I know, not the best benchmarking tool ever, but when comparing apples to apples [literally!] any significant differences should be apparent) and compared it to a stock old G5. You can check out the results here.
As you can see, the systems ran neck and neck all the way down the page. The total scores were less than 1% apart! Some interesting things to note:
- Processors now identify themselves as "PowerPC G5x2 @ 1.80 GHz" instead of "PowerPC 970x2 @ 1.80 GHz"
- The computer is QUIET! I don't have enough experience to say if it's quieter than the old 1.8, but it sure will be nice to have such a quiet machine!
- The motherboard looks just like any other G5's. There are even solder points for the extra memory banks.
I think the deciding factor is how much you will use what comes with the machine. So your very much right in your choice.
I'm not big into huge HD's, but needed more than the 80 GB in the new model- like the 160GB wich was in the old model. Otherwise I would have spent an extra ~130 for a drive. Then there is RAM- I have 1GB (2x512) on hand and Id like to be at 2GB- with the old model I'll be at 1.5GB now and the next update would be cheap since it's only 2X256 with no waste of the OEM RAM. But most people will do great with 1.25GB or even 512MB.
If the two machines were different chips that would possibly make a real difference. It's just cool that dual G5's are more affordable than ever!