It comes down to cost vs size. You want more speed, but don't mine paying a little more, go with SSD. You want a larger drive at a lower price, go with 5400rpm.
The Apple upgrade configs aren't grotesquely expensive for the purchaser, although it's a pretty obscene markup when you consider that Apple get to 'keep' the base memory.
If Apple guarantee to replace defective soldered memory at cost price for the lifetime of the computer, regardless of the computer's warranty, then I'd be more happy to buy into the soldered model.
Sorry, you've lost me. Especially in combination with your response to another post complaining about the soldered memory:Seriously?
You realize the common reason for replacing RAM is upgrading, right?
Are you saying that memory should be user-replaceable/upgradable, or are you saying the complete opposite?You won't need more RAM, unless you're planning to edit videos and then you'll need a whole new machine ,not only RAM
its really pathetic watching people on this forum blindly defend apple on this issue.
apple told us the soldered-in ram in the rMBP was for reducing the overall thickness of the device.
there is no excuse or justification WHATSOEVER to have soldered-in RAM on the latest mini.
and to top off the ridiculousness of the latest mini, they removed the quad core option.
then there's people on here talking like this is a good thing! "well if you dont like it just spend another $2000 to get what you want"
what the hell is wrong with you people?
steve jobs wanted to make things thin. tim cook wants to....make money. i'm done with apple now. i sold my rMBP and ipad air a month ago. replaced it with a surface pro 3.
i had to laugh at the latest ipad announcement.
this modern skeleton of apple cant even give us a touch screen on a laptop, and wont give us OSX on a hybrid tablet.
the innovation is not happening at apple anymore.
if you think a higher res screen is innovation, no wonder you are cheerleading for apple without thinking critically.
if you think soldered-in ram on a non-portable device is a good thing, just stop pretending to be a computer enthusiast for any meaning of the term.
This isn't too surprising. The Mac mini has always been a notebook in desktop clothing. They have long used soldered RAM in the MacBook line.
And yes, Steve Jobs would have done this. His philosophy was that people shouldn't have to and should not tinker with his creations.
Question:
If you would have a choice between the Mac Mini basel model 2012 and the basel model of 2014, both for the same price, which one would you choose?
Can anyone confirm that the 2012 model, in real life situation, doing some CAD, Photoshop and Indesign (No games, no video editing), is faster than the 2014 model?
any thoughts?
thanks
I'm on the fence about the soldered RAM...
On the one hand, I've upgraded the memory in every computer I've ever owned, so this move to soldered memory annoys me.
On the other hand, I'll bet most consumers probably replace their computer before they upgrade their memory.
Apple (and other computer manufacturers) apply a lot of brainpower and market research when they make these moves. Sometimes they get it wrong but they usually get it right.
Anyway, this is not a place to gather consumer opinion data. I've been on this forum for ten years and new product releases are almost always greeted with whining and criticism all out of proportion to what the sales figures say.
The Mac Mini has always been a machine to bring PC users to experience the Mac OS... All you need is the keyboard, mouse and monitor from your PC and you can try out a Mac for peanuts... (Ok, solid gold peanuts maybe, but still)
That said, making such a device non-user-upgradable hurts that intent. The Mini has never been big on upgrades, but to make even the most basic of upgrades a non-option feels like nothing but... the blinkered philistine pig-ignorance we've come to expect from you non-creative garbage...
"Dear consumer - don't worry about the complicated, `technical` task of plugging a card into a slot - we did the hard part for you, to ensure your (already) numb mind remains that way"
There therrrre, don't you worry your little head over it - Apple's taken care of it alllllll...
Image
is it true that the older Mini had a quad core and the new version is only dual core?
I'm surprised 16 GB is the max amount of RAM for the Mac Mini. These days most computers can handle 32 or 64 GB or RAM.
Upgradeable ram is a must. I have lots of computers and I swap ram between them. That is the beauty of it. I am not forking up the cash up front for ram I might need in the future. Thats utter BS.
It's not about upgrades, it's about replacing bad parts. RAM fails. And it does so fairly regularly compared to many components.
If soldered ram fails, the entire logic board must be replaced - by apple.
It makes the entire product disposable. And generally disposable products are cheap crap made to be thrown away.
Like it or not, that is how apple chooses to define itself.
I'm referring to Phil's remarkable price-cut on the base model. You mean the Fusion Drive (it's a half-baked PCIe solution) which adds 50% to the price of the base mini?Why don't you read the tech spec on the Apple store, or look at the upgrade options on the mid and high level model then, or watch the keynote for that matter. There is a PCIe option.
Yes, it is.
What kind of idiot upgrades ram instead of getting it all in the first place?