Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I remember reading about that System X cluster in high school. That was when we got our G5's for video production. That is also about the same time I first used a mac, besides the beige Apple II's when I was in elementary school. I wish I had only one 8-core MP with Snow Leopard and dual Nvidia Geforce 9800's. Can you imagine how the GPGPU's and 8 cores would fly if they were full optimized and put to use in software? Thats a supercomputer right there IMO.
 
I read the article, and neither OS X, XGrid, or FB-DIMMS are mentioned at all.

Steve

Not saying that they are specifically mentioned, but this paragraph in particular caught my eye. Plus, I know in general what the needs are of those kinds of systems, and you can't just build one using systems with celerons (exaggeration to make a point).

Varadarajan and his team chose Mac Pros for a few reasons. For one, Xserves are power dense, which requires a lot of cooling to prevent thermal hot spots. "System X has a hybrid liquid-air cooling system in a dedicated facility, which enables significantly better cooling without hot spots. This machine is however, housed in a conventional air cooled room," Varadarajan told us. Also, the Mac Pro has a large number of power and temperature sensors built in, which is necessary for the power/performance research and tuning, as well as an additional full-height PCI Express 2.0 slot for use in other research projects. And, despite common wisdom to the contrary, the Mac Pros beat other systems on price. "The Mac Pros are highly competitive even against building a white box off the cheapest prices," he added.
 
Can the Mac Pro super-computer max out Crysis? That's the question.

No, it can't. Nor can it play Doom. Nor will it blend.

It will, however, run an algorithm that determines how to open the gates of hell...allowing you to participate in your own real-life version of Doom.

And it will run it "snappily". :cool:
 

The system was upgraded to 2.3 GHz Xserve G5s approximately a year later. Ars notes that if System X were to be upgraded to current generation Xserves, the result would be a "8800-core monster that could push as much as 100 Tflops—at least in theory— coming close to Top 10 territory."
Article Link

Yes, but can it run vista :eek: properly? ;)

LMAO.

DSCN0207.jpg


Disclaimer: Why would you want to put such amazing computing power the the hands of the "sleeping giant?"
 
So the 10 TFLop system is 3rd place and the 100TFlop system will come close to the top20? article sux
 
Its called "progress"

So the 10 TFLop system is 3rd place and the 100TFlop system will come close to the top20? article sux

There is nothing wrong with the article, 2003 is ancient history in computer terms. What was fast then, is slow now. In 2003 10 TFlop had you cracking the top 10, in 2008 you need a lot more.

That is aewsome!!! i just do not see a use for such a complex computer:apple::apple:

I do. Many fields of research use computer simulation to derive solutions. For example, when there is no way to obtain a closed form solution for a mathematical problem, we can numerically derive a fairly precise approximation using Monte Carlo techniques.

As such, big problems require big computers.

To give one quick example, a small project I am working on had 140 PowerMac G5's working 24x7 for about a month. I would love to halve or quarter that time as it impedes my research and slows my publication rate. I am also one in a group of researchers, who all need computer time.

While personal computers have gotten sufficiently fast it seems (although the HD crowd may disagree) in terms of research, we still have a long way to go until we are have sufficiently fast research machines.
 
Why use 329 Mac Pros when you could use 30 AMD Radeon HD4700s installed in 15 computers to get that same figure?

somehow i dont think that the GPU's would be able to manage ALL of the calculations that need to be performed. it would require alot of reprogramming anyways wouldnt it?? CPU's would be much easier, plus think of all the extra space/RAM they would get.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.